Were any Trump convictions remanded for new trials or resentencing in 2025?

1. The New York conviction: conviction sustained, sentence discharged, no remand to a new trial

The New York criminal trial that resulted in a May 2024 jury finding of guilt on 34 counts of falsifying business records remained a completed conviction through early 2025 and was resolved at sentencing with an “unconditional discharge” on January 10, 2025 — meaning no fines, prison time or probation were imposed — and coverage indicates courts declined to halt that sentencing ^{[4] [1] [2] [3]}. Those facts show the case proceeded to and concluded at sentencing rather than being sent back for a new trial or resentencing in 2025 ^{[1] [3]}.

2. The immunity litigation and the question of remand

Litigation over presidential immunity reached the Supreme Court and produced rulings that required lower courts to apply the immunity guidance to pending charges; Ballotpedia’s timeline notes the Supreme Court’s ruling resulted in remanding matters to lower courts to determine which charges could proceed, but the timeline and related coverage in the supplied sources do not document any 2025 decision that sent an already‑completed conviction back for a new trial or resentencing as a direct result of those immunity holdings ^[4]. The reporting shows courts weighed immunity claims and declined to block sentencing in at least the New York case, rather than ordering retrials ^{[4] [2]}.

3. Clemency and executive action altered outcomes but are distinct from remand

In 2025, extensive clemency actions by President Trump changed the legal landscape for many defendants — the Justice Department’s clemency records and reporting show mass and high‑profile grants of executive clemency — but a pardon or commutation is not the same procedural outcome as a court‑ordered remand for retrial or resentencing ^{[5] [6]}. The supplied sources document hundreds to more than a thousand clemencies in 2025 that affected sentences and convictions for others, but they do not indicate courts remanded any of Trump’s convictions for additional judicial proceedings in 2025 ^{[5] [6]}.

4. What the coverage does not show and reporting limits

The available sources supplied here focus heavily on the New York case, national clemency activity, and related litigation chronology; none of them report a 2025 remand of any Trump conviction that led to a new trial or resentencing ^{[4] [1] [2] [3] [5]}. That absence in these sources supports the clear answer that no such remand is documented here, but it is important to acknowledge the limitation: if a court elsewhere issued a remand later in 2025 that is not captured in the provided reporting, that event cannot be affirmed or disproven on the basis of these sources alone ^{[4] [1]}.

5. Competing frames and why the distinction matters

Some commentary and partisan framings conflated judicial motions, immunity rulings, or later executive clemency with “undoing” convictions; however, the concrete procedural event the question asks about — a court remanding a conviction for a new trial or resentencing in 2025 — is not shown in the supplied reporting, which instead shows a conviction that stood and a sentencing that resulted in an unconditional discharge ^{[4] [1] [2] [3]}. Those are legally and politically different outcomes: judicial remand/retrial is a court‑ordered retracing of trial proceedings, while an unconditional discharge or executive clemency is an outcome reached without reopening the guilty verdict by means of a new trial ^{[3] [5]}.