How have courts and appeals affected Donald Trump’s criminal convictions through December 16 2025?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Courts and appeals have produced a mix of conviction, limited enforcement, disqualifications and ongoing litigation: a Manhattan jury convicted Donald Trump of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records on May 30, 2024, but Justice Merchan later imposed an unconditional discharge at sentencing on January 10, 2025 [1] [2]. Georgia proceedings were paused and then saw prosecutor Fani Willis disqualified by the Georgia Court of Appeals in December 2024, a ruling the Supreme Court of Georgia declined to review in September 2025 [3]. Several federal matters and other appeals remained active through 2025, and reporting shows prosecutors and courts continuing to litigate immunity, juror-misconduct and other appellate issues [4] [5].
1. A historic conviction, then an unusual sentence — the New York case
The Manhattan criminal trial concluded with a jury finding Trump guilty on 34 counts of first‑degree falsifying business records related to payments before the 2016 election [1]. That conviction was sustained by Judge Juan Merchan in post‑trial rulings in late 2024 and early 2025, and Merchan rejected juror‑misconduct claims and other challenges before sentencing [5]. At sentencing on January 10, 2025, Merchan imposed an unconditional discharge — a sentence that carries no prison time, fines or other penalties — marking a singular outcome after a felony conviction [2] [1].
2. Appeals: conviction preserved on lower‑court rulings, appeal filings ongoing
After the January sentencing, Trump’s team filed notices of appeal to New York appellate courts and sought relief in higher forums; reporting notes an active appeal effort in 2025 [5] [4]. Courts, including the state trial judge, have already rejected several pre‑sentencing and post‑verdict challenges — for example, Merchan explicitly held that the Supreme Court’s presidential‑immunity decision did not nullify the New York conviction [4] [5]. As of late 2025, sources show the appeal trail continuing, with Trump asking the First Department and other courts to overturn the conviction [5] [4].
3. Georgia’s case: pause, disqualification of prosecutor, and appellate fallout
The Fulton County prosecution was paused in mid‑2024 while appellate courts considered whether district attorney Fani Willis had conflicts warranting disqualification [3]. The Georgia Court of Appeals disqualified Willis from prosecuting in December 2024, a decision that fundamentally altered the trajectory of that state case [3]. The state Supreme Court declined to take up an appeal in September 2025, leaving the disqualification ruling as a pivotal development in Georgia litigation [3].
4. Federal matters and dismissals: shifting landscape after 2024 elections
Sources report that after Trump’s 2024 election victory, two federal cases were dismissed; the Justice Department also abandoned certain appeals in late 2024 and early 2025 relating to co‑defendants, reflecting how prosecutorial priorities and appellate strategies shifted with political change [1]. Ballotpedia and Lawfare chronicle those dismissals and the changing posture of federal prosecutors toward continuing appeals [4] [1].
5. Broader legal effects: immunity rulings, procedural battles, and collateral penalties
Courts have repeatedly addressed whether presidential immunity affects criminal prosecutions; in the New York matter, Judge Merchan ruled that the U.S. Supreme Court’s immunity decision did not invalidate the conviction [4]. Separate civil and administrative appeals also continued: for instance, federal appeals courts upheld penalties in other Trump‑related suits and preserved other adverse legal rulings [6]. These parallel decisions demonstrate that appeals have not uniformly shielded Trump from legal consequences, even as enforcement outcomes vary [6] [1].
6. What the record shows and what it does not — limitations in available reporting
Available sources document the New York conviction, the January 2025 unconditional discharge, Georgia’s prosecutor disqualification and multiple ongoing appeals and dismissals through 2025 [1] [2] [3]. Sources do not mention the final outcome of all pending appeals as of December 16, 2025, nor do they provide comprehensive rulings from every appellate court in every jurisdiction; detailed appellate briefs and unpublished orders are not in these excerpts [4] [5]. Where reporting notes actions — for example, filings to the First Department or the Supreme Court declining intervention — the full appellate record and any later decisions are not fully reproduced here [5] [4].
7. Competing perspectives and implicit stakes
Prosecutors and some courts treated these cases as enforceable criminal matters that survived immunity arguments and post‑trial challenges [5] [1]. Conversely, disqualifications, dismissed appeals and the unconditional discharge illustrate defenses’ success in limiting practical penalties and in shifting forum outcomes [3] [2]. Political context matters: appellate and prosecutorial decisions occurred amid a change in presidential administrations and evolving Department of Justice priorities, which reporting indicates affected which appeals were pursued or dropped [1].
Bottom line: through December 16, 2025, appellate and court actions produced a conviction in New York that was upheld by the trial judge and appealed by Trump, an extraordinary unconditional discharge at sentencing, a disqualification that stalled the Georgia prosecution, and an unsettled mix of dismissals and ongoing appeals in federal matters — a fragmented, jurisdiction‑by‑jurisdiction legal landscape reflected in contemporary reporting [1] [2] [3].