How many federal judges did Trump appoint and to which courts?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
President Donald J. Trump, across his time in office and into his second term through December 9, 2025, had 260 Article III federal judges confirmed — including three Supreme Court associate justices — plus a slate of Article I and territorial (Article IV) judges, bringing his total federal judicial footprint well beyond the Article III bench [1]. The appointments are concentrated in the courts of appeals and district courts but also include specialized Article I tribunals; reporting on the scale and impact varies sharply by source and by political perspective [1] [2] [3].
1. Total Article III judges confirmed and where they sit
As compiled in contemporary listings, 260 of Trump’s nominees were confirmed to Article III courts as of December 9, 2025: three associate justices of the Supreme Court, 60 judges to the United States courts of appeals, 194 judges to the United States district courts, and three judges to the United States Court of International Trade [1]. That consolidated count reflects confirmations across Trump’s first term and the beginning of his second and is the most up-to-date aggregate in the public listings cited [1].
2. The three Supreme Court picks and their provenance
Three justices nominated by Trump reached the Supreme Court during his earlier presidency — Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — each confirmed through the constitutionally required nomination-and-Senate-confirmation process and repeatedly cited by trackers of his judicial legacy [4] [2]. Those Supreme Court appointments are focal points in narratives about lasting institutional change because of the lifetime tenure and high-stakes doctrinal impacts associated with the high court [2] [4].
3. Article I and territorial appointments: the less-noticed layer
Beyond Article III, Trump made a notable number of Article I and territorial appointments: 26 Article I judges (including ten to the United States Court of Federal Claims, seven to the U.S. Tax Court, six to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, two to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, and one to the U.S. Court of Military Commission Review), plus one appointment to an Article IV territorial court, according to itemized lists [1]. Those slots do not carry lifetime Article III tenure but shape federal adjudication in specialized subject areas and are often omitted from headline counts focused solely on Article III courts [1].
4. How sources frame the numbers — praise, context, and dispute
Different sources emphasize different storylines: the Trump White House celebrated the pace and ideological bent of confirmations, touting circuit and district numbers as a “historic” transformation [5], while independent trackers and scholars documented the raw counts of nominees, confirmations, withdrawals, and vacancies and noted that many confirmations occurred in Trump’s first term [2] [6]. Critics, including policy groups and legal centers, pointed to demographic skew and ideological consequences of that appointment strategy as central to understanding the import of the numbers [3] [7].
5. What the raw totals obscure and where reporting differs
The headline totals — whether the 260 Article III figure or earlier tallies of “234” or “245” from specific terms — mask important distinctions: how many nominees were merely announced versus confirmed, how many were Article III versus Article I, and how counts shift over time as new confirmations occur or vacancies open [2] [1]. Sources sometimes reflect partisan or institutional agendas — the White House framing stresses accomplishment and legacy [5], academic and civic groups stress institutional effects and diversity concerns [6] [3] — and reconciled totals are best taken from up-to-date confirmation trackers and court rosters [1] [8].