Are Donald Trump Elon Musk and Bill Gates named together in any Palm Beach County lawsuits related to Jeffrey Epstein?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
A civil complaint filed in Palm Beach County on November 24, 2025 publicly names Donald Trump, Elon Musk and Bill Gates together as defendants in a single $310 million lawsuit that alleges an “Epstein‑identical” trafficking and exploitation venture; that filing and its core allegations have been reported by multiple outlets and verified as having been submitted to Palm Beach County court [1] [2] [3]. The suit is a state civil action with anonymous plaintiffs, extensive and sensational allegations, and — as of the reporting — no parallel criminal charges against the named defendants [4] [2].
1. The filing: who was named, where and for how much
Multiple media reports say a 149‑page civil complaint was filed in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court in Palm Beach County on November 24, 2025 and seeks about $310 million in damages, naming Donald Trump (in both individual and official capacities), Elon Musk and Bill Gates among other defendants [4] [1] [5]. Local outlets covering court filings and several national websites reproduced the central claim that the complaint frames the alleged activity as an eight‑year trafficking and exploitation venture described by plaintiffs as “identical in every material respect” to Jeffrey Epstein’s operation [1] [5] [6].
2. What the complaint alleges (as reported)
Reporting summarizes that the complaint alleges long‑running grooming and coordinated sexual assaults, claims that the Gates Foundation was used as a “cover and silencing mechanism,” accusations of misappropriation of the plaintiff’s intellectual property, and even allegations that the plaintiff’s infant child was taken in retaliation — allegations the complaint frames as mirroring Epstein‑era tactics [2] [1] [4]. The accounts emphasize that plaintiffs are anonymous and much of the suit’s factual narrative is presented through that confidential claim file, which restrains outside verification at this stage [4] [6].
3. What the record shows now: civil filing, not criminal indictment
The available reporting and fact‑checks repeatedly note this is a civil lawsuit filed in state court and not a criminal indictment, and that the named individuals are defendants in a complaint rather than persons convicted or charged in criminal court for these specific allegations [3] [2]. Snopes’ coverage reviewed the public filing and confirmed the existence of the Palm Beach County complaint after social posts amplified the claim [3]. Reporting also notes that none of the named defendants face active criminal charges tied to the suit’s allegations as of the published articles [2] [4].
4. Sources, credibility and competing narratives
The story’s circulation has depended on a patchwork of local court reporting (e.g., BocaNewsNow), niche and partisan outlets (Raw Story, DigitalChew, various blogs) and aggregators that sometimes amplify sensational wording; independent verification beyond the court filing is limited in the public reporting reviewed here [1] [2] [6]. Snopes’ piece functions as a reality‑check confirming the filing exists, which strengthens the basic factual claim that the three men are named together in a single Palm Beach County civil suit [3]. At the same time, the heavy reuse of identical language across outlets and the anonymity of plaintiffs mean the public record currently rests on the complaint’s allegations rather than corroborated facts.
5. Legal and practical caveats to keep in mind
Civil complaints routinely make serious accusations that must survive motion practice, discovery and — if allowed to proceed — a trial; naming high‑profile figures can pressure news cycles regardless of eventual legal outcomes, and the complaint’s claims remain allegations until proven in court [4]. Reporting indicates the case was pending initial court review and seeking expedited relief, but it’s premature to equate filing with truth or criminal culpability; the articles uniformly note the absence of criminal charges tied to these claims at the time of reporting [7] [2].