What property and corporate assets of the Trump Organization are listed in New York court judgments filed by the attorney general?

1. What the court judgments filed in New York actually name

Public filings and local clerk records show the attorney general entered judgments in Westchester County that specifically reference Trump National Golf Club in Briarcliff Manor and the private Seven Springs estate in Bedford, signaling those parcels as among the first properties where collection steps could proceed if the judgment is not bonded or paid ^{[1] [2]}. Reporting from multiple outlets likewise notes that a judgment was entered in New York City — the venue where key properties such as 40 Wall Street and Trump Tower are located — and that those locations are implicated by the broader judgment and enforcement posture even if not every title is immediately seized ^{[5] [6]}.

2. Corporate assets and New York business entities targeted by the judgment

The attorney general’s complaint and subsequent remedies point to a web of Trump Organization companies and New York limited liability companies used to hold and report values for real-estate assets; Justice Engoron ordered the termination of certain state business licenses and the dissolution of pertinent LLCs as part of the relief he directed, tying the corporate shell structure to the enforcement strategy ^{[4] [7]}. The AG’s published addendum laying out “Background on Trump Organization Properties and Fraudulent Schemes” catalogues numerous properties and the company entities that presented values to banks and insurers, indicating the office has identified both real-estate assets and the corporate vehicles that held or reported them ^[3].

3. How the AG’s filings translate into possible seizures or holds on property

Entering a judgment with county clerks is a technical but important enforcement step that allows a creditor — here, the state AG — to place liens, seek foreclosure, or move to have assets turned over if collection becomes necessary; Westchester filings were specifically characterized as preparatory moves toward possibly seizing the golf course and Seven Springs if Trump fails to post the required appeal bond or otherwise satisfy the judgment ^{[2] [1]}. The AG’s office told appeals courts it could use multiple bonds or have real-estate interests held to secure the judgment, and the court has at times limited immediate corporate dissolution or revocation pending appeals ^{[8] [4]}.

4. Limits of the public record and what is not yet enumerated

While the AG’s addendum and clerk filings name specific properties and indicate the corporate entities implicated, publicly available reporting does not present a single, exhaustive list of every property or company title entered in all jurisdictions — reporting highlights key parcels and the existence of many Trump Organization LLCs but does not substitute for a parcel-by-parcel land-record search or the AG’s full asset addendum for a definitive inventory ^{[3] [2]}. Courts and parties have also litigated whether assets must be sold or merely held during appeal, and appellate orders have at times paused some enforcement steps, limiting immediate seizure ^{[9] [10]}.

5. Competing interpretations and political stakes behind which assets are emphasized

The AG frames named properties and corporate entities as part of a broad fraud scheme that inflated asset values to deceive lenders and insurers, and thus focuses enforcement on both the real-estate holdings and the LLCs that reported them ^{[7] [3]}. Defendants and some commentary portray the remedies as overreaching and politically motivated, arguing that forcing sales or requiring massive appeal bonds would constitute an unconstitutional taking or “fire sale,” a point pressed in court filings and media statements by Trump’s lawyers ^{[8] [11]}. Readers should note these competing agendas: the AG emphasizes market integrity and restitution, while defendants emphasize procedural and constitutional protections during appeal ^{[7] [8]}.