Which Trump Organization properties in New York were listed in the Attorney General’s judgments and filings?

1. The attorney general’s complaint and the “six properties” framework

When Attorney General Letitia James filed her civil fraud complaint she publicly flagged a set of properties whose valuations she says were repeatedly misrepresented to lenders and insurers; reporting summarized that office’s focus as “six properties” central to the investigation and suit, with Seven Springs and 40 Wall Street among them ^{[1] [8]}. The AG’s own “properties addendum” (an official companion document to the complaint) exists as the most direct source listing the assets the office scrutinized, though public summaries in media have distilled that list into the most prominent New York holdings ^{[7] [8]}.

2. The Westchester targets: Seven Springs and Trump National Golf Club Westchester

The AG’s office moved first in Westchester County, filing judgments in county records that put a legal hold on properties where the office can seek enforcement; those filings explicitly concern the Seven Springs estate and the Trump National Golf Club Westchester, both north of Manhattan and repeatedly cited in the court’s valuation findings ^{[2] [3] [4]}. Reports note that registering the judgment in the county clerk’s office is a technical, preliminary step that would allow county-level seizure or sheriff’s sale proceedings if the judgment is not bonded while appeals proceed ^{[3] [2]}.

3. Manhattan’s marquee holdings: 40 Wall Street, Trump Tower penthouse and Trump Park Avenue

In the Manhattan proceedings Judge Arthur Engoron’s findings referenced several high-profile Manhattan assets as having been misvalued, including 40 Wall Street and the Trump Tower penthouse, and reporting and the AG’s complaint also point to Trump Park Avenue in the list of disputed valuations ^{[5] [3] [6] [1]}. Media accounts and court records show the civil judgment was entered in New York City and that those Manhattan properties were part of the assets the AG’s office contends were used to misstate net worth on financial statements presented to banks and insurers ^{[3] [8]}.

4. What was officially “listed” vs. what reporting emphasized

There is a distinction between the AG’s operative filings (the complaint and the properties addendum) and subsequent media coverage: some outlets emphasize the Westchester filings—because registering a judgment there is a tangible step toward seizure—while others highlight the broader roster of properties the AG says were misvalued over many years in the complaint itself ^{[2] [3] [1] [8]}. The authoritative record for exactly which properties are “listed” in the AG’s legal pleadings is the complaint and its addendum ^{[8] [7]}; public summaries and news stories, however, consistently single out Seven Springs, Trump National Golf Club Westchester, 40 Wall Street, Trump Tower (penthouse), and Trump Park Avenue ^{[1] [4] [6] [3]}.

5. Pushback, limitations and why the distinction matters

Defendants have vigorously disputed the findings and the remedy, arguing the judgment is excessive and that forcing sales of iconic properties would be irrational and irreparable if reversed on appeal—claims cited in reporting on the appeals phase ^[9]. It is important to note reporting limitations: while multiple news organizations cite a repeating set of properties, only the AG’s filings (the complaint and the properties addendum) provide the definitive list of assets the office identified; those filings are publicly available and should be consulted to verify whether additional New York properties beyond those frequently named were formally listed ^{[8] [7]}.