Which other plaintiffs (e.g., Summer Zervos, writer Jane Doe cases) reached settlements with Donald Trump or the Trump Organization and what were the reported amounts and NDA clauses?

1. Big‑ticket corporate settlements dominate recent coverage

Much of the recent public record supplied focuses on settlements between Trump (or Trump personally) and major media and tech companies: Meta agreed to a $25 million settlement and X (formerly Twitter) about $10 million; YouTube/Google agreed to pay $24.5 million to resolve a suspension lawsuit, with court filings describing how funds were directed to public projects and other plaintiffs ^{[1] [2] [3]}. These items are routinely described in media and court filings in the sources provided and illustrate a pattern of high‑profile commercial settlements rather than traditional private hush‑money payouts ^{[1] [2]}.

2. Universities and the federal government: settlements and funding restorations

Some settlements in the record concern the Trump administration’s enforcement actions or negotiations with universities and federal agencies rather than private plaintiffs. For example, Cornell and other universities reached deals to restore federal funding after Title VI investigations; reporting cites over $250 million in restored funds for Cornell and mentions the administration’s role in securing settlements with universities ^{[4] [7]}. These are institutional settlements overseen by government actors and not private NDAs between individuals and Trump Organization entities ^{[4] [7]}.

3. The “Jane Doe” cases: litigation history, dismissals and limited settlement evidence

The set includes many documents and dockets concerning “Jane Doe” litigation variants alleging sexual assault, claims linked to Jeffrey Epstein, and other suits that were filed and in some instances withdrawn or dismissed. For example, a 2016‑era “Jane Doe” rape suit was voluntarily dismissed in November 2016 according to The Guardian and related court dockets show withdrawals and docket activity ^{[5] [8]}. Other Jane Doe suits appear in appellate and district dockets ^{[9] [8] [10]}. But the sources in this collection do not present a clear, confirmed list of Jane Doe plaintiffs who reached monetary settlements with Trump or the Trump Organization nor settlement amounts or NDA clauses tied to those specific Jane Doe suits—available sources do not mention final settlement terms for those Jane Doe claims in this set ^{[8] [5]}.

4. Summer Zervos and other individual claimants: sparse or absent settlement reporting here

Summer Zervos has been a prominent accuser in public reporting outside this document set, but the sources provided to me do not include a detailed settlement record for Zervos with Trump or the Trump Organization; accordingly, available sources do not mention settlement amounts or NDA clauses for Zervos in this material (not found in current reporting). Where individual defamation or assault claims are discussed in these sources (for instance E. Jean Carroll), some case outcomes and settlement-like payments appear in broader timelines, but the provided documents do not enumerate Zervos’s settlement status or NDA specifics ^[11].

5. NDAs: Trump’s frequent use but legal limits and uneven disclosure

The collection documents Trump’s frequent use of nondisclosure and non‑disparagement agreements across business, campaign, and White House contexts and notes legal challenges to their scope and enforceability ^{[12] [13] [14]}. Academic analyses and reporting indicate NDAs with indefinite durations and non‑disparagement clauses have been used by Trump entities and that courts have sometimes invalidated overly broad campaign NDAs ^{[12] [13]}. Still, the present sources do not uniformly attach specific NDA texts or clause-by-clause settlements to individual plaintiffs named in your query—available sources do not mention the precise NDA language or clause enforcement terms tied to each settlement at issue here ^{[12] [13]}.

6. What the record here supports — and what it does not

The documents supplied demonstrate: (a) multiple high‑value corporate settlements with Trump (YouTube/Google $24.5M; Meta $25M; X ~$10M) ^{[1] [2] [3]}; (b) institutional settlements involving the Trump administration and universities (Cornell over $250M restored funding) ^{[4] [7]}; and (c) extensive litigation history involving “Jane Doe” pleadings, docket movements, and some voluntary dismissals ^{[8] [5]}. They do not provide definitive settlement amounts or NDA clause texts specifically for Summer Zervos or for many individual Jane Doe claims within this set—available sources do not mention those specifics in the material provided (not found in current reporting).

If you want, I can: (a) search for authoritative news and court documents specifically on Summer Zervos and Jane Doe settlement outcomes and NDA texts, or (b) compile a timeline of the major tech/media and university settlements noted here with direct document links. Which would you prefer?