Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What were the outcomes of the lawsuits filed against Trump for sexual misconduct in the 2010s?
Executive Summary
Donald Trump faced multiple civil lawsuits alleging sexual misconduct originating in the 2010s; the most definitive legal outcome tied to those allegations is a civil jury verdict finding him liable for sexual abuse and defamation in E. Jean Carroll’s case, with multi‑million dollar awards that have been appealed and further litigated [1] [2]. Other suits from the same period produced mixed procedural results: some were dismissed or settled without damages, others remained pending or in interlocutory appeals, leaving no criminal convictions from the 2010s for sexual assault tied to these claims [3] [4] [5].
**1. How one landmark civil verdict changed the record**
E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuits produced the clearest judicial finding connected to allegations about events she says occurred in the mid‑1990s: a New York civil jury in 2023 found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation and awarded Carroll roughly $5 million, a decision later affirmed in part by the Second Circuit and followed by additional awards that collectively reached tens of millions in damages; those rulings have been stayed by appeals and subjected to Supreme Court filings by Trump’s lawyers [1] [6] [7]. The legal posture after those rulings is that a civil court found liability on a preponderance standard, producing monetary judgments rather than criminal penalties. The cases underscore the distinction between civil liability and criminal guilt, and they triggered cross‑appeals and ongoing litigation over evidentiary rulings and jurisdictional questions [6] [7].
2. Which 2010s lawsuits ended quietly or without money changing hands
Several other women who accused Trump of sexual misconduct in the 2010s pursued civil actions with varied procedural endings. Summer Zervos, who accused Trump of unwanted kissing and groping in 2007 and later sued for defamation after he denied her claims, ultimately ended her nearly five‑year‑old defamation suit without receiving compensation and without extracting sworn testimony from Trump under oath, while retaining the right to speak publicly about her allegations [4] [8]. Court filings and reports show that some litigants accepted non‑monetary resolutions or dismissals, and other suits were dismissed on procedural grounds or were still being litigated as of later reports, reflecting a patchwork of outcomes rather than a single uniform legal result from the 2010s allegations [4] [5].
3. What stayed unresolved or remained on appeal into the mid‑2020s
Several matters originating from the 2010s carried forward into later litigation and appeals. The Carroll verdict and subsequent damage awards prompted appeals to higher courts, with Trump’s legal team arguing evidentiary and legal errors and seeking Supreme Court review; the appellate process produced at least one affirmance and ongoing appellate filings challenging aspects of the judgments [6] [7]. Other suits remained in procedural limbo: some defamation complaints were allowed to proceed past dismissal motions, while separate claims were characterized as settled without a monetary award but with preserved rights to speak—outcomes that left legal finality in question for multiple claimants [5] [4].
4. Why there were no criminal convictions from the 2010s allegations
Despite numerous public allegations and civil litigation, the record contains no criminal convictions charging Trump with sexual assault or rape arising from allegations publicized in the 2010s. Civil juries can award damages based on a preponderance of evidence, which differs from the beyond‑a‑reasonable‑doubt standard required for criminal convictions; reporting and fact checks note that civil liability in Carroll’s case and other civil‑law resolutions do not equate to criminal charges or convictions [3] [1]. Prosecutorial discretion, statutes of limitation, differences in evidence standards, and the choice of alleged victims to pursue civil remedies rather than criminal complaints explain why the decade’s allegations led to civil courtroom outcomes rather than criminal verdicts [3].
5. How courts and commentators framed competing narratives and legal strategies
Courts and litigants framed these disputes through adversarial legal arguments: plaintiffs emphasized factual accounts and sought damages or vindication, while defendants—including Trump—challenged credibility, raised procedural defenses, and described allegations as politically motivated or legally deficient; those positions shaped pleadings, motions to dismiss, and appeals [7] [8]. Media and fact‑check reporting grouped outcomes into verified legal judgments—such as the Carroll verdict—and unresolved matters or dismissals, noting that the balance of civil rulings and collateral appeals produced a complex mosaic rather than a single conclusive judgment across all 2010s allegations [1] [5].