Which court dockets list charges against individuals identified as Turning Point USA members and what are their current dispositions?
Executive summary
A review of the provided reporting finds civil litigation and administrative disputes that name Turning Point USA (TPUSA) as an organization or list students seeking chapter recognition, but no source in the packet shows criminal court dockets that charge individuals identified as TPUSA members or records their criminal dispositions; available material documents political activity, campus-rights lawsuits, organizational profiles, and public filings rather than indictments or criminal case dispositions [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. The question being asked and what the sources actually cover
The user seeks court dockets listing charges against individuals identified as TPUSA members and the current dispositions of those charges; the assembled sources primarily address TPUSA’s organizational history, civil suits about campus recognition and free-speech claims, and public nonprofit filings, not criminal prosecutions or criminal dockets naming TPUSA-affiliated individuals [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
2. Civil litigation involving TPUSA or students claiming TPUSA affiliation
Several documents in the record show TPUSA or students trying to form TPUSA chapters as parties in civil litigation or admin disputes: the Alliance Defending Freedom summary describes students who tried to start a SUNY Cortland chapter and were denied recognition, a dispute framed as a free‑speech/association issue rather than criminal charges [2], and the Climate Litigation Database records a 2017 federal suit by students/TPUSA against Macomb Community College that resolved in settlement rather than criminal prosecution [3].
3. Organizational profiles and reporting that contextualize disputes but do not list criminal dockets
Profiles and watchdog pages—Wikipedia’s overview of Turning Point USA and SourceWatch’s dossier—catalog controversies, donors, campus fights, and political activity involving TPUSA but do not cite criminal court dockets or criminal charges against named TPUSA members in the provided excerpts [1] [6]. TPUSA’s own site similarly promotes its mission and campus programming without referencing criminal cases involving members in these sources [5].
4. Where one would find criminal docket information (and what the provided sources include instead)
Federal and state court electronic filing systems (for example, the CM/ECF portal referenced for the District of Colorado) are the places to locate criminal dockets and dispositions; the sources include a CM/ECF court portal link as an example of docket access but do not supply an actual criminal case search result tying TPUSA members to charges [7]. Public nonprofit filings and databases like ProPublica’s Nonprofit Explorer in the packet detail financial and governance records for TPUSA but are not criminal-docket repositories [4].
5. What can be concluded from the provided reporting—and the limits of that conclusion
Based strictly on the supplied sources, there is no documented list of criminal court dockets charging individuals identified as TPUSA members, nor are there dispositions of such criminal cases in the material provided; the available records instead document civil disputes over recognition and speech, organizational profiles, and public filings [2] [3] [1] [4]. This analysis is constrained by the curated packet: absence of evidence here is not evidence of absence beyond these sources, and locating criminal dockets would require searching court databases, news reports, or official indictments not included in the materials furnished [7].
6. Alternative explanations, possible reporting gaps, and next steps for verification
It remains possible that criminal charges against individuals who are or were TPUSA members exist outside the supplied set of documents; those would appear in court dockets accessible via federal and state court CM/ECF systems or local clerk offices, and in contemporaneous investigative reporting—avenues not represented in these excerpts [7]. For definitive answers, one must query specific court jurisdictions’ docket systems or consult reliable court-reporting outlets; the sources here show civil filings and organizational context but do not provide criminal-case dockets or dispositions [2] [3] [4].