Has Tyler Boyer been formally arraigned and what charges does he face?

1. What the sources actually name: Tyler Bowyer, not “Boyer”

Multiple items in the results identify a person spelled “Tyler Bowyer” as one of Arizona’s fake electors who was indicted in connection with the 2020 post-election scheme and later included on a list of pardoned individuals; those items use the “Bowyer” spelling ^{[1] [2]}. The search results do not contain any clear item that uses the name “Tyler Boyer” in connection with an arraignment or indictment on these facts ^{[1] [2]}.

2. Indictment and pardon reporting: core facts from the set

Reporting cited in these results states that all the fake electors involved in the Arizona scheme were indicted, and that President Trump issued pardons to a group that included those fake-elector participants; Tyler Bowyer is listed among them ^{[1] [2]}. Those pieces present the sequence: indictment of fake electors, later pardons — but the provided snippets do not include details about any specific arraignment date or criminal charges listed against Bowyer beyond his identification as a fake elector ^{[1] [2]}.

3. Court docket documents in the results do not establish an arraignment

The search results include general court calendar or docket pages (Travis County criminal case settings; Superior Court of Santa Barbara criminal calendars; a Jackson County warrant list) that could, in theory, show arraignment entries, but the snippets and pages supplied do not display an entry for “Tyler Boyer” or “Tyler Bowyer” or list an arraignment or the charges sought; therefore those documents in this packet do not confirm an arraignment ^{[3] [4] [5]}.

4. Where the available reporting is silent or limited

The assembled sources do not specify whether a formal arraignment occurred for Tyler Bowyer/Boyer, nor do they list precise criminal counts against him in the documents provided here; the sources only identify him by name among indicted fake electors and later pardoned persons ^{[1] [2]}. Available sources do not mention a formal arraignment date, the exact statutory charges, or plea entered (not found in current reporting).

5. Two possible explanations for the gap

Either (A) a formal arraignment did occur but is not included in the supplied search results — court dockets and local reporting often carry those details and those documents exist elsewhere — or (B) the case proceeded in ways covered by other reporting (indictment, charging instrument, pause or legal maneuvering) and an in-court arraignment was not reported in these snippets. The materials provided do not allow me to distinguish between those possibilities ^{[3] [1]}.

6. How to verify the missing specifics

To confirm whether an arraignment occurred and to see the exact charges, consult the official criminal docket for the jurisdiction that filed the indictment (Arizona county or state court where the fake-elector indictments were returned) or the prosecutor’s public records; the Travis County or local court calendars referenced in these results are examples of where one would look, but the supplied extracts do not show the relevant entry ^{[3] [4]}.

7. Audience takeaway and caveats about names and sources

Be careful with name spellings: the record snippets here point to “Tyler Bowyer” as the implicated fake elector ^{[1] [2]}. Drawing definitive conclusions about arraignment status or the particular criminal counts against “Tyler Boyer” from these materials would overreach the available evidence; the sources supplied either do not address arraignment or refer to a differently spelled name ^{[1] [3] [2]}.

If you want, I can search official Arizona court records or local prosecutors’ filings (provide the jurisdiction you want searched) to attempt to locate a formal arraignment entry and the charging document for Tyler Bowyer/Boyer.