Are there public court documents or chargesheets available for Tyler Boyer's case?
Executive summary
Publicly accessible court materials do exist for a person named Tyler Boyer: a New Hampshire Supreme Court opinion is available on FindLaw (The State of New Hampshire v. Tyler Boyer) [1], and case-tracking summaries referencing a State v. Boyer decision are publicly posted [2]. For the similarly named Tyler Bowyer cited in recent reporting about “fake electors,” the U.S. Supreme Court docket lists a party named Tyler Bowyer, but the provided reporting does not include a chargesheet or criminal complaint for that matter [3] [4].
1. Name matters: Boyer vs. Bowyer — a crucial distinction
Public records and news sources in the provided set use two spellings — “Tyler Boyer” in older judicial materials and “Tyler Bowyer” in news reports about alleged fake electors — and that divergence matters because court document searches are keyed to precise names and jurisdictions [1] [4]; conflating the two risks mistaking a decades-old state-court criminal opinion for contemporary election-related charges.
2. A concrete public court opinion exists for Tyler Boyer (New Hampshire)
A full appellate opinion in The State of New Hampshire v. Tyler Boyer is posted on FindLaw and details suppression-of-evidence issues arising from a warrantless entry and arrest, which demonstrates that formal, published court documents tied to that name are part of the public record [1].
3. Public tracking and summaries corroborate the Boyer decision
Independent legal-tracking sites list State v. Boyer and summarize holdings about consent and search-and-seizure doctrine, which confirms there are accessible court rulings concerning a Tyler Boyer beyond a single copy on FindLaw [2].
4. For “Tyler Bowyer” tied to fake-elector reporting, docket entries exist but no chargesheet in provided sources
Reporting identifies a Tyler Bowyer as one of the alleged fake electors in 2024–25 coverage, and the Supreme Court docket search shows a party named Tyler Bowyer listed in filings [4] [3]; however, the supplied news items and docket snippet do not include or reproduce a state or federal chargesheet or criminal complaint for that individual, so the supplied materials do not establish a publicly posted chargesheet.
5. Why chargesheets may be absent from these sources — jurisdiction, format and publication practices
Some court systems publish full complaints and case dockets online while others publish only opinions or limited docket entries; additionally, recent pilots and reforms about electronic public access to court files vary by country and court (for example, planned pilots in England and Wales that change what documents go into a public CE-file) and illustrate that availability is jurisdiction-dependent, not uniform [5] [6].
6. Recent news reports reference Bowyer/Bowyer but don’t substitute for primary chargesheets
News outlets and local trackers can identify alleged participants in investigations and cite indictments or pardons, but the provided news snippets about a Tyler Bowyer being a fake elector and subsequent reporting on pardons or state charges do not themselves include scanned chargesheets or direct links to a charging instrument in the public record [4] [7].
7. Bottom line — what can be confidently affirmed and what remains unresolved
Confidently: a public appellate opinion exists for a Tyler Boyer in New Hampshire and is accessible via FindLaw, and docket references for a party named Tyler Bowyer appear in a Supreme Court search [1] [3]. Not shown in the provided materials: an actual state or federal chargesheet or criminal complaint for the Bowyer/Boyer entries tied to the recent “fake electors” reporting; the supplied sources therefore do not demonstrate that a public chargesheet is available for that contemporary matter [4] [7].