Which court and jurisdiction is handling Tyler Robinson's case?

1. Where the case is filed — Provo, Fourth Judicial District Court

Court documents and local reporting show Robinson’s case is pending in the Fourth Judicial District Court in Provo, Utah County; defense motions petitioned “the Provo 4th District Court” to allow civilian clothes and no restraints during appearances, and local judges in that court are handling scheduling and orders ^{[1] [4]}.

2. Who is presiding — Judge Tony Graf

Multiple outlets name Fourth District Judge Tony F. Graf Jr. as the judge overseeing the matter. He read charges at early proceedings, has set hearing dates, and issued interim rulings such as permitting civilian clothing while limiting public view of restraints ^{[3] [4] [2]}.

3. Charges and prosecutorial posture — aggravated murder and death-penalty notice

Utah prosecutors have charged Robinson with aggravated murder and related counts; reporting states the prosecution plans to seek the death penalty, which explains the heightened formality and discovery disputes in the Fourth District Court proceedings ^{[2] [5] [3]}.

4. What the court is handling now — pretrial motions and discovery battles

Coverage shows the court is actively addressing pretrial matters: defense requests about clothing and restraints, motions to manage publicity and discovery, and scheduling for preliminary hearings or arraignment. Judge Graf has scheduled and adjusted hearing dates to allow defense review of what both sides call “voluminous” evidence ^{[1] [3] [6]}.

5. Media access and courtroom rules — restrictions already ordered

The Fourth District Court has limited media exposure of Robinson’s physical restraints and prohibited photographing or videoing certain courtroom visuals; those orders signal the court’s effort to balance public interest with a defendant’s fair-trial concerns given intense worldwide coverage ^{[4] [1]}.

6. Why jurisdiction matters — Utah law and capital eligibility

The case’s placement in Utah carries specific legal consequences: Utah permits the death penalty for aggravated murder, and prosecutors must file a notice of intent to seek capital punishment within statutorily prescribed timelines — a factor directly influencing motions and defense strategy before Judge Graf in Utah County ^{[7] [5]}.

7. Competing viewpoints in press reporting

Local Utah outlets, national news organizations, and specialty outlets all report the same forum (Fourth District in Provo) and judge (Graf), but they emphasize different angles: local outlets focus on procedural rulings and courtroom management ^{[1] [4]}, national outlets underline the charges and prosecutorial intent to seek death ^{[2] [5]}, and legal analysts highlight discovery and jury-prejudice concerns ^{[6] [3]}.

8. What reporting does not say — limits of available sources

Available sources do not mention any transfer of venue to another county or federal court, nor do they report a final decision on the defense’s broader publicity-order requests beyond interim rulings; those topics remain pending in court filings and future hearings ^{[8] [1]}. If you are seeking the latest docket events or filings, court records in the Fourth Judicial District would have the authoritative updates ^[3].

9. Practical takeaway for readers following venue and jurisdiction

For now, the authoritative venue is the Fourth Judicial District Court in Provo, Utah County, before Judge Tony Graf; the Utah criminal statutory framework — including capital-prosecution procedures — will shape pretrial scheduling, discovery disputes, and any future motions to change venue or publicity orders ^{[1] [7] [3]}.

Limitations and sourcing: this summary is built only from the provided reporting and local-court coverage; it cites those sources directly and does not assert developments not mentioned in them ^{[1] [2] [4] [3] [5] [7]}.