What are the main land corridors smugglers use along the U.S.-Mexico border and how have they changed recently?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Smugglers use multiple land corridors across the roughly 2,000‑mile U.S.–Mexico border—principally Arizona, Texas and California sectors—and recent reporting and government statements say activity has shifted in response to stepped‑up enforcement, increased Mexican cooperation, and maritime diversions [1] [2] [3]. U.S. and Mexican enforcement actions since late 2023 are tied to large drops in Border Patrol encounters—US data show encounters fell sharply in late 2024–2025 and officials tout disruption of thousands of smuggling operations [4] [5] [2].
1. Historic corridors: desert highways and urban gaps
For years smugglers have relied on western San Diego/California crossings, the vast deserts and ranchlands of Arizona, and the long, porous Rio Grande and brush country of Texas — the Border Patrol divides the region into nine sectors along roughly 2,000 miles of frontier where most clandestine land crossings have occurred [1] [5]. Organized smuggling networks use both remote stretches to evade detection and roads and highways to move people inland after crossing, often exploiting weakly policed interior corridors reported by U.S. and Mexican authorities [4] [2].
2. Recent shifts tied to U.S. and Mexican enforcement
Analysts and federal releases credit coordinated U.S.–Mexico enforcement since late 2023 with large declines in apprehensions: DHS states November–December encounters were the lowest since August 2020 and Border Patrol encounters in early January 2025 were nearly 50% lower than the same point in 2021, and Migration Policy Institute links Mexico’s stepped‑up interior checkpoints to a 53% decline in irregular arrivals between December 2023 and May 2024 [4] [2]. These changes have pushed smugglers to adapt routes, and U.S. agencies say they have disrupted “thousands of human smuggling operations” including stash‑house raids and seizures of vehicles used to move migrants [4].
3. Land corridors are dynamic: diversion, displacement, and adaptation
Research flagged by Migration Policy warned that tougher land enforcement can expand business for smugglers by shifting crossings to tunnels, maritime routes, or more remote areas that had been quiet [2]. Government fact sheets similarly emphasize targeted operations and international cooperation to dismantle networks, implicitly acknowledging smugglers will seek alternate corridors when pressure rises [4]. Available sources do not map every newly emerging clandestine route in granular detail; reporting notes only that corridors adapt as enforcement and policy change [4] [2].
4. Maritime and air pathways are affecting land patterns
U.S. agencies and local reporting show increased attention to sea routes—maritime smuggling off Southern California and along U.S. coastlines has risen in prominence as land pathways tighten, with media ride‑along coverage underscoring deadly ocean crossings and CBP/Coast Guard responses [3]. Government and watchdog reports also note commercial aviation and third‑country air corridors are being used to funnel people into Central America and Mexico before an overland attempt, prompting diplomatic and visa‑restriction actions [6] [3].
5. Quantities and outcomes: encounter data and interpretation
Official CBP encounter datasets form the empirical basis for these claims; reporting shows a steep decline in detected crossing attempts in 2025 compared with 2024, including very large drops in the San Diego sector and an overall fall in encounters across sectors [1] [5]. The White House and BBC cited preliminary FY2025 figures—about 238,000 Border Patrol apprehensions for that fiscal year—used to argue crossings have fallen to multi‑decade lows, while Migration Policy and DHS point to Mexican enforcement as a major factor [7] [8] [2].
6. Competing narratives and political context
Federal releases stress “unprecedented” disruption of smuggling networks and cooperation with Mexico [4]. Political actors and advocacy outlets frame the same data differently: some emphasize enforcement success and national‑security wins, others warn that forced displacement of routes increases humanitarian risk and invites new, deadlier corridors such as maritime and tunnel smuggling [4] [2] [3]. Sources cited here include government fact sheets and independent policy analysis—each advances distinct priorities (disruption metrics versus humanitarian risk).
7. What’s missing or uncertain in reporting
Detailed, up‑to‑date open‑source maps of newly emerging clandestine land corridors and cartel operational changes are not provided in the cited material; available sources do not mention precise new corridor maps at the community or county level [4] [2]. Likewise, while several pieces link maritime and air diversions to land changes, comprehensive quantitative breakdowns of crossings by route type over 2024–25 are not found in the current reporting [3] [6].
Bottom line: enforcement and bilateral actions since late 2023 have changed where and how smugglers operate—pressuring long‑used land corridors and encouraging adaptation into maritime, tunnel, interior‑transport and air‑assisted pathways—but precise, granular shifts remain incompletely documented in available sources [4] [2] [3].