What were the key provisions of the UK's 1997 firearms ban?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Two pieces of legislation in 1997 radically tightened handgun law across Great Britain: the Conservative government’s Firearms (Amendment) Act 1997 outlawed larger-calibre handguns, and the incoming Labour government’s Firearms (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1997 extended that prohibition to virtually all cartridge handguns including .22 rimfire, effectively placing most handguns in Section 5 (prohibited weapons) of the Firearms Acts for Great Britain while leaving Northern Ireland under a different regime [1] [2] [3].
1. The two-step ban: large calibres first, then .22s
Parliament passed two Acts in 1997: the earlier Firearms (Amendment) Act made large‑calibre handguns (above .22/.22 rimfire threshold) subject to prohibition, and later in the year the Firearms (Amendment) (No. 2) Act closed the remaining loophole by banning small‑calibre (.22) cartridge handguns used for private possession, meaning that after both Acts most private ownership of cartridge handguns was outlawed in Great Britain [1] [2] [4].
2. Drafting around “short firearms” and Section 5 – legal technicalities that mattered
The Acts were drafted in terms of “short firearms” and brought those weapons within Section 5 prohibited‑weapon status, a technical formulation that outlawed possession in private but preserved the Secretary of State’s power to grant narrowly defined exemptions under the 1968 Firearms Act, and required police to treat affected handguns as prohibited unless specific dispensation applied [3] [5].
3. Exemptions, dispensations and sporting events
The law explicitly allowed limited exemptions: specially authorised possession for things like muzzle‑loading firearms, starting pistols, or for legitimate occupational use (vets, slaughtering instruments) and the Secretary of State could grant Section 5 dispensation for international competitions—hence the government said hosting the Commonwealth or Olympic events remained possible with short‑term permissions for competitors [5] [6] [7] [4].
4. Licensing, clubs and the end of mainland pistol sport as it had been
The Acts removed the licensed pistol‑club provisions that had previously permitted club‑based pistol shooting on the mainland, meaning that in general pistol sports could no longer be practised on Great Britain and British competitors often had to train abroad; Parliament acknowledged the ban would prevent participation in several Commonwealth shooting disciplines unless special arrangements were made [7] [3] [4].
5. Compensation, surrender and enforcement mechanics
Owners who lawfully held now‑prohibited handguns on or immediately before the prohibition date were entitled to compensation and were required to surrender prohibited firearms and ancillary equipment where they had no practicable alternative use; the statutory framework also tightened surrender, measurement and classification rules to ensure the new prohibitions could be enforced [8] [5] [2].
6. Geographic exception: Northern Ireland
Both Acts applied to Great Britain (England, Wales and Scotland) and explicitly did not extend to Northern Ireland, where different policing and security considerations meant handguns could still be held for target shooting or collections under that jurisdiction’s rules [2] [9].
7. Penalties and policing powers
The legislative package augmented criminal penalties for unlawful possession of prohibited small firearms and aligned offences with severe maximum sentences; guidance and police licensing practice were tightened so firearms certificates, club conditions and storage/fitness-to-hold assessments would reflect domestic violence, substance misuse or mental health concerns [8] [6] [5].
8. Political pressure and dissenting views
The laws emerged in the wake of the Dunblane massacre and heavy public pressure from the Snowdrop campaign, and while many supported a comprehensive ban, some MPs and interest groups argued the Cullen recommendations did not require outlawing .22 pistols and warned of unintended consequences for sport and legitimate owners—Parliamentary divisions recorded explicit objections to a total .22 ban [9] [10].