How have overall crime rates in the UK changed since 2010 and what factors explain the trends?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Overall recorded crime in England and Wales fell dramatically from the 1990s into the 2010s, then showed a mixed picture since 2010: some traditional offences (theft, burglary, homicide) continued long‑term declines, while police‑recorded violent offences and fraud have risen in parts of the last decade — the ONS reports 535 homicides in the year to March 2025, down from 567 the year before [1], while fraud and computer‑misuse incidents have driven rises in survey and recorded totals in recent years [1] [2].
1. A long decline, then divergence by offence: the headline pattern
Crime in the UK cannot be summarised by a single trajectory. The long “crime drop” that began well before 2010 continued for many traditional offence types after 2010 — for example theft remains far below its 1995 peak and homicide numbers are much lower than in the early 2000s [3] [1]. At the same time, police recorded violence and public disorder have risen in some years of the last decade and fraud and computer misuse have grown, producing a mixed overall picture [4] [1] [2].
2. Measurement matters: survey vs police records
Two main measures drive the debate: the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) and police recorded crime. The CSEW is the best indicator of long‑term trends for household crime because it is unaffected by changes in police recording, whereas police figures cover more offence types (including businesses and non‑household populations) but are influenced by recording practice and police activity [5]. ONS explicitly warns police recorded crime is not always a good indicator of general trends and recommends using both sources together [1] [5].
3. The fraud and cyber effect: a new driver of totals
Fraud and computer misuse have become a major driver of increases in headline incidents since the 2010s. The CSEW’s headline figures rose in recent years largely because fraud estimates jumped — the CSEW estimated 4.2 million fraud incidents in year ending March 2025, markedly influencing the total [2]. The Home Office, ONS and other bodies are engaged in work to improve fraud statistics because changes in recording and referral routes have affected trends [6].
4. Violence, knives and public concern: what the data say
Public anxiety has focussed on violent crime, knife offences and high‑profile stabbings. Homicide — the most reliably recorded violent crime internationally — is lower now than in the early 2000s and was 535 offences in year ending March 2025 [1] [3]. But police‑recorded violent offences and public disorder have increased in parts of the last decade, and recording changes have amplified some of that rise, making interpretation complex [4] [5].
5. Policing, resources and outcomes: supply‑side explanations
Researchers and official reports link changing police resources, priorities and recording practice to crime trends. Cuts to police funding and officer numbers after 2010 are associated in analyses with rising recorded crime in the mid‑2010s, while later increases in officers and spending have complicated the picture [7] [8]. Crime outcome tables show that detection and charge rates fell sharply from around 2010/11 levels before partially recovering — outcomes therefore affect public perception and the criminal justice response [9] [6].
6. Structural and social explanations: demand‑side factors
Explanations offered in the literature include improved security and technology reducing opportunities for theft, demographic shifts, and local socio‑economic drivers such as deprivation and alcohol availability shaping violent crime in cities like London [10] [11]. The National Crime Agency highlights that serious organised threats — cyber, fraud, drugs, and online exploitation — have grown as society moves online [12].
7. Politics, media and perception: why people feel crime is rising
Public belief that crime is rising outstrips survey measures; the ONS and academic commentary point to media sensationalism and political rhetoric about emotive crimes as drivers of perception [9] [5]. Changes in recording and increased reporting of sensitive crimes (sexual offences, domestic abuse) also raise recorded totals even when long‑term underlying incidence may differ [2] [1].
8. What we do and don’t know from available sources
Available sources show clear declines in many traditional offences since the 1990s and mixed trends since 2010, driven by fraud growth, recording changes, and varying patterns for violent crime [3] [2] [5]. Available sources do not mention a single unified cause for post‑2010 trends; instead they present competing explanations (policing resources, recording practices, technological change, socio‑economic factors) that must be combined to interpret the data [7] [10] [12].
Limitations: this summary relies on ONS, Home Office and related reporting from the provided sources; local variation is large and some datasets (CSEW face‑to‑face suspension 2020–22) and ongoing efforts to improve fraud recording mean year‑on‑year comparisons require care [13] [6].