What penalties did people convicted of online hate speech in the UK receive in 2024?

Checked on November 29, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

In 2024 people convicted of online hate speech in the UK faced penalties that fall into three broad categories: custodial sentences, fines and community-based punishments, and sentencing “uplifts” when hostility is proved — all set within existing statutes such as the Public Order Act, Communications Act and Scotland’s Hate Crime and Public Order Act which came into force 1 April 2024 [1] [2] [3]. Prosecutors can seek an increased penalty where hostility to protected characteristics is shown under section 66 of the Sentencing Act 2020 and related legislation, and sanctions therefore vary by offence severity and jurisdiction across England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland [4] [3].

1. Criminal penalties: imprisonment, fines and community sentences — the statutory baseline

UK law treats many forms of online hate as potential criminal conduct; where speech crosses into threatening, abusive or encouraging hatred it can trigger prosecution and penalties ranging from fines to imprisonment or community orders depending on the offence and its seriousness [5] [6] [7]. Section 127 of the Communications Act and Public Order Act offences have historically carried custodial options and fines; government and rights bodies note the legal framework allows prison sentences as well as monetary penalties for the most serious online communications offences [5] [1].

2. Sentencing uplifts: harsher punishments when hostility is proven

Prosecutors routinely use statutory “uplifts” when an offence is motivated by hostility towards a protected characteristic. Section 66 of the Sentencing Act 2020 gives courts an express direction to increase penalties within existing maximum thresholds where race, religion, sexual orientation, disability or gender identity hostility is established — meaning identical underlying offences can attract heftier punishments if framed as hate-motivated [3] [4].

3. Devolved differences: Scotland and Northern Ireland changed the landscape in 2024

Scotland implemented the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act on 1 April 2024, expanding and consolidating protections and creating specific stirring-up and communication offences; Scottish officials framed the Act as strengthening protections while critics warned of policing pressure and free‑speech impacts [2] [3]. Northern Ireland’s criminal law already allows enhanced sentences for offences aggravated by hostility under the Criminal Justice (No.2) (Northern Ireland) Order 2004, so punishments there also reflect aggravation where hatred is shown [3].

4. Online Safety Act and enforcement context: platform duties and new levers

The Online Safety Act — passed in 2023 and operative in 2024 — broadened regulators’ and platforms’ roles in policing online harm, creating a regulatory frame that complements criminal sanctions; commentators and rights groups warned this could shift enforcement from purely criminal courts to a mix of platform moderation and statutory oversight [1] [8]. Available sources do not mention specific new prison terms uniquely created by that Act for ordinary users in 2024; they emphasise platform duties and Ofcom oversight [1] [8].

5. What the record shows about typical outcomes — enforcement is case‑by‑case

Public-facing guidance and watchdog summaries stress a high threshold for criminal prosecution — many vile or offensive posts remain non‑criminal and recorded instead as “non‑crime hate incidents,” but where prosecution succeeds punishments reflect the underlying offence with possible uplift for hostility [9] [10] [4]. The Crown Prosecution Service confirms prosecutors can seek sentence increases where hostility is evidenced, but the specific sentence for any defendant depends on offence type, facts and jurisdiction [4] [3].

6. Competing viewpoints and political context

Authorities and victims’ advocates argue tougher enforcement and new laws are necessary to curb real‑world harms originating online; human‑rights organisations and some commentators warn the same laws risk chilling free expression and overburdening police and courts — a debate reflected in media coverage of Scotland’s Act and in criticism of the Online Safety Act’s potential privacy and free‑speech costs [2] [8] [1].

7. Limits of the available reporting

Available sources describe the statutory palette of penalties (fines, community sentences, imprisonment and sentencing uplifts) and the 2024 legal changes in Scotland and regulatory shifts via the Online Safety Act, but they do not provide a compiled public list of individual 2024 convictions with their exact sentences or aggregate sentencing statistics for online hate convictions in that year [3] [1] [2]. For case‑level outcomes and numerical tallies you must consult court records, CPS annual data or investigative reporting not present in these sources (not found in current reporting).

Summary judgement: the law in 2024 exposed online speakers to the full range of criminal sanctions — fines, community penalties and prison — with statutory tools to increase sentences when hostility toward protected groups is proven, while devolved changes (notably Scotland’s 2024 commencement) and the Online Safety Act changed enforcement dynamics without replacing the existing sentencing framework [4] [3] [1].

Want to dive deeper?
How many people were prosecuted for online hate speech in the UK in 2024?
What laws and statutes govern online hate speech prosecutions in the UK in 2024?
What sentences and penalties were most commonly handed down for online hate speech convictions in 2024?
Were there notable UK court cases in 2024 that set precedents for online hate speech penalties?
How did police and prosecutors use social media evidence to secure convictions for online hate speech in 2024?