What are the UK's statistics on sexual assault by nationality?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The question about UK statistics on sexual assault by nationality reveals a complex data landscape with significant limitations and conflicting interpretations. Official UK crime statistics do not routinely break down sexual assault data by nationality or ethnicity, making comprehensive analysis challenging [1].
However, some specific data points have emerged from recent analyses. Foreign nationals accounted for 14.1% of sexual offence convictions in 2024, representing a 62% increase in convictions between 2021 and 2024 [2]. This data comes from Ministry of Justice records and shows that certain nationalities, including Afghans, Syrians, and Iranians, had higher numbers of convictions [2].
The most detailed fact-checking analysis examined claims made by Nigel Farage regarding Afghan nationals. While Farage claimed that Afghan males are 22 times more likely to be convicted of rape than UK-born individuals, the actual figure based on Office for National Statistics and 2021 Census data is closer to three times higher [3]. This represents a significant discrepancy between political rhetoric and statistical reality.
General sexual violence statistics in the UK show alarming overall rates: approximately 1 in 4 women have been raped or sexually assaulted since age 16 [4], and 1 in 8 women were victims of sexual assault, domestic abuse, or stalking in the last year according to ONS estimates [5]. In university settings specifically, 14% of students experienced sexual violence and 25% experienced sexual harassment [6].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The analyses reveal several critical gaps in understanding this issue comprehensively. The available data does not support broad claims that migrants are more likely to commit sexual or gender-based violence [7], suggesting that selective use of statistics may create misleading impressions.
Systemic bias and racial profiling concerns are highlighted as significant factors that could skew both data collection and interpretation [7]. This perspective emphasizes that conviction rates may not accurately reflect actual offending patterns due to potential disparities in policing, prosecution, and judicial processes.
The rate of increase in convictions among foreign nationals is higher than for British nationals [2], but this statistic lacks crucial context about population changes, reporting patterns, and enforcement priorities. Without understanding whether this reflects actual crime increases, improved detection, or changes in immigration patterns, the data remains difficult to interpret meaningfully.
Data availability issues significantly hamper comprehensive analysis. While some statistics exist through the Crime Survey for England and Wales and police recorded crime data, the information is not consistently broken down by ethnicity or nationality [1]. This limitation means that much of the public discourse relies on incomplete or selectively presented information.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
While the original question appears neutral, it occurs within a context where statistical claims about nationality and sexual assault are frequently misrepresented for political purposes. The analysis of Farage's claims demonstrates how figures can be dramatically inflated - from a factual "three times higher" rate to a claimed "22 times higher" rate [3].
The framing of nationality-based crime statistics inherently carries risks of promoting discriminatory narratives. The emphasis on foreign nationals in recent reporting [2] may contribute to xenophobic attitudes without providing the broader context necessary for informed understanding.
Media coverage appears to focus disproportionately on increases in foreign national convictions while potentially underemphasizing the much larger scale of sexual violence committed by UK nationals. Given that foreign nationals represent 14.1% of sexual offence convictions [2], UK nationals still account for approximately 85.9% of such convictions.
The complexity highlighted in the analyses [7] suggests that simple nationality-based statistics cannot capture the multifaceted nature of sexual violence, which involves socioeconomic factors, cultural contexts, and systemic issues that transcend national origin. Political figures and media outlets may exploit incomplete data to advance particular agendas rather than promoting evidence-based policy discussions about preventing sexual violence effectively.