Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are the most common social media offenses leading to arrest in the UK?
Executive Summary
The most-common social-media-related arrests in the UK cluster around broadly defined “offensive” communications, non-consensual intimate image abuse (NCII), and new statutory offenses created or reinforced by the Online Safety Act 2023. Available data indicate thousands of arrests for offensive online speech in 2023 and a statutory emphasis on NCII and threatening or harmful online communications, but prosecution and conviction rates are substantially lower than arrest figures, and enforcement focus has shifted toward platform duties as well as individual criminal liability [1] [2] [3].
1. Why tens of thousands of arrests? A surprising commonality in “offensive” online speech
Parliamentary data released in 2025 show the UK recorded over 12,000 arrests in 2023 for communications deemed “offensive,” framed under laws that criminalize messages causing “annoyance,” “inconvenience,” or “anxiety.” Those figures translate to more than 30 arrests per day, a scale that has prompted scrutiny about the statutory language used by police and the potential chilling effect on online expression. The parliamentary reporting stresses that most of these arrests do not lead to convictions, signaling a gap between policing activity and prosecutorial outcomes [1].
2. Non-consensual intimate image abuse (NCII) is now a statutory enforcement priority
Legislative reforms through the Online Safety Act 2023 and later policy work have made NCII a named criminal concern, creating specific offenses for sharing intimate images without consent and placing duties on regulated platforms and search services to remove such content. Government and campaign literature frame NCII as a serious personal harm with life-changing consequences, and the law now combines individual liability with platform removal duties to curb circulation and reduce victim harm [2].
3. The Online Safety Act reshaped what gets enforced — new offenses and platform duties
The Online Safety Act 2023 established a duty of care for platforms, required removal of illegal material including terrorism and child sexual abuse content, and introduced offenses such as cyberflashing and sending threatening messages. The Act empowers Ofcom to regulate platforms and enforce compliance, while also signaling a prosecutorial pathway for individuals who upload or threaten others. This dual approach means some arrests reflect platform obligations prompting police action, while others derive from pre-existing criminal law applied to online conduct [3].
4. Arrests versus convictions — a persistent gap that matters for interpretation
Multiple analyses note a consistent pattern: high arrest volumes but comparatively low conviction rates for online “offensive” communications. Parliamentary figures emphasize arrests as an initial enforcement touchpoint rather than proof of criminality, and commentators have highlighted the risk that vague statutory terms produce discretionary policing. This gap complicates the simple claim that the UK uniquely criminalizes online comment; rather, it shows aggressive policing intersecting with legal thresholds that are not always met in court [1].
5. Different enforcement logics: personal harm crimes versus broad public-order offences
Enforcement falls into two broad categories: personal-harm crimes such as NCII and threats, where the law targets clear victimization, and public-order or nuisance-style offenses historically used to police abusive or offensive speech online. The former increasingly benefits from statutory clarity and platform takedown duties; the latter often relies on older statutory language about causing “annoyance” or “anxiety,” which explains high arrest counts but also legal contestability and policy debate [2] [1] [4].
6. Political and policy tensions: free expression concerns and calls for clearer law
Parliamentary reporting and commentary in 2025 highlight concerns about vagueness and proportionality, with critics warning of a chilling effect on lawful speech and advocates urging stronger protection for victims of NCII and online threats. The Online Safety Act attempts to reconcile these tensions by shifting more responsibility onto platforms while creating targeted individual offenses, but debates persist over whether enforcement practices and statutory language strike the right balance [1] [4] [2].
7. Bottom line: what counts as “most common” depends on the lens you use
If “most common” is measured by arrests recorded by police, offensive online communications under broad public-order provisions are numerically dominant in 2023; if measured by legislative prioritization and public policy urgency, NCII and threatening/harmful communications are the focus of recent legal reforms and platform duties. Both perspectives are accurate in different respects: arrest data show policing patterns, while statutory changes show where law and regulators aim enforcement energy [1] [2] [3].