Has there been a recent spike in arrests for online speech in the UK and what statistics support it (2024–2025)?

Checked on December 21, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Public reporting and parliamentary debate point to a marked rise in arrests linked to online communications in the UK during 2023–2025 — often framed as “over 30 arrests a day” or roughly 12,000 a year — but the picture is uneven because there is no single official central dataset and Freedom of Information (FOI)‑based tallies vary between forces [1] [2] [3].

1. The headline numbers: how the “30 a day / 12,000 a year” figure entered the record

Multiple commentators, the Times’ FOI-based analysis cited in an EU parliamentary question, and Lords debate material state that police are making “more than 30 arrests a day” for online offensive communications, which aggregates to roughly 12,000 arrests a year and is routinely cited in 2024–25 reporting and commentary [1] [2] [4].

2. What the FOI and media tallies actually show — increases, but not uniform coverage

Investigations that pooled FOI returns from individual forces produced the high arrest totals and showed big increases since the late 2010s (for example comparing 2019’s 7,734 detentions cited in media analysis with later totals), but not all forces supplied data and different analyses use slightly different offence categories, so the FOI-based totals are best read as strong evidence of an upward trend rather than an exact national census [5] [3] [6].

3. Parliamentary and expert remarks put the rise in context but rely on the same imperfect sources

House of Lords debate and parliamentary questions frame the situation as a “free speech emergency” and quote an increase of about 121% from 2017 to 2025 in arrests for offensive online messages — a figure deployed to argue urgency — but those figures trace back to FOI and media analysis rather than a single government release, and Lords Library notes the government does not publish arrests by the specific malicious‑communications statutes centrally [2] [3].

4. Nuance: types of cases, convictions and policing choices

Analyses underline that the recorded arrests mix non‑threatening “offensive” communications and threatening conduct, that convictions have not risen in parallel (suggesting many arrests do not lead to guilty verdicts), and that forces vary widely in practice — points that civil liberties groups and some commentators use to argue the law is being applied inconsistently and may chill lawful expression [3] [5].

5. Event‑driven spikes and separate datasets complicate the trend line

Specific events — notably the summer 2024 protests and riots — produced concentrated arrest activity (by 30 August 2024 some 1,280 people had been arrested in that period, of whom 796 were charged), showing that discrete episodes can drive temporary spikes distinct from the broader year‑on‑year rise in communications‑related detentions [7].

6. What the evidence supports — and what it does not

The preponderance of reporting and parliamentary statements supports the conclusion that arrests for online speech increased noticeably in the early‑to‑mid 2020s and that contemporary tallies produce figures in the low tens of thousands per year (the oft‑cited “over 30 per day / ~12,000 a year” claim) — but the exact magnitude, year‑to‑year trajectory for 2023–2025, and breakdown by offence type remain uncertain because central government publishing is limited and FOI returns are incomplete and heterogenous [1] [3] [6].

7. Stakes, critics and divergent readings

Civil liberties groups and free‑speech advocates present the numbers as evidence of over‑policing and legal vagueness; policing and prosecutorial voices point to the need to address online harms and to distinguish threatening from non‑threatening communications — both perspectives lean on the same imperfect data, which makes strong causal claims about motives or policy effects harder to substantiate from the available sources [5] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
How do UK police forces classify and record arrests for communications offences (section 1 vs section 127) in their crime data?
What does Ministry of Justice conviction data show for malicious communications and communications‑related offences from 2017–2024?
How have civil liberties groups in the UK documented and litigated cases of arrests for online speech since 2022?