What are the UN and WHO reported civilian vs. combatant death breakdowns in Gaza as of December 2025?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Available UN/WHO-linked reporting and independent analyses show no single, fully verified civilian-vs.-combatant breakdown for Gaza as of December 2025. UN OCHA and WHO relay Gaza ministry figures but do not independently classify all casualties by combatant status, and independent investigations and leaked Israeli military data produce very different ratios — e.g., a Guardian analysis of a leaked IDF database suggested about 83% civilian among the dead when Gaza’s mid‑2025 toll was ~53,000 [1] [2].
1. The official UN/WHO position: relaying but not fully classifying
UN OCHA’s casualty dashboard and related UN commentary state that their publicly posted counts rely on sources and that classification of a casualty as “civilian” requires verification; OCHA notes that someone who does not have a combat function is considered a civilian for its datasets, but it also warns that casualty additions will only be made after independent verification and that in this war it has not been conducting the same real‑time, independent combatant/civilian distinctions it has in some past conflicts [1] [3].
2. WHO’s role and limitations in the tally
WHO regional officials earlier described Gaza’s Hamas‑run health ministry reporting as having “good capacity in data collection,” but WHO does not provide a separate, fully verified civilian/combatant split in its public tallies; the BBC noted WHO officials had said Gaza ministry figures were credible while also observing those tallies do not distinguish civilians from combatants [4]. Available sources do not mention a WHO‑published, independently verified civilian‑vs‑combatant breakdown as of December 2025.
3. Gaza health ministry and Gaza Ministry figures: high totals, no combatant tagging
The Hamas‑run Gaza Ministry of Health provided cumulative death totals through 2025 (for example claims above 61,000–72,500 at different dates), but its casualty lists do not separate civilians from combatants, and multiple analysts and institutions have warned those totals are not stratified by combatant status [5] [6]. The ministry’s methodology and the fact it records only bodies recovered have also been flagged as complicating accurate classification [2].
4. Independent and leaked data that produce divergent ratios
Investigations and leaked Israeli military data have yielded very different pictures. A Guardian report based on a classified IDF intelligence database suggested that, if its figures are correct, about 83% of Palestinians killed by Israeli forces were civilians when the Gaza toll stood at roughly 53,000 — a finding the IDF disputed [2]. Other independent analysts and institutes caution that the available data and methodologies produce high uncertainty and do not permit a single reliable ratio [3] [7].
5. Scholarly estimates and demographic inferences: proxy methods, wide ranges
Where official classification is absent, analysts have used demographic proxies (sex and age breakdowns) to estimate a “lower bound” of civilian deaths. Studies cited in public sources have produced a range of civilian estimates — for instance, some scholars have estimated roughly 61–80% civilian among Palestinian fatalities depending on methodology, while NGOs have occasionally produced higher figures — but these rely on assumptions (for example treating women, children and elderly as civilians) and therefore yield different outcomes [6] [8].
6. Why precise civilian/combatant splits remain elusive
Multiple structural reasons explain the disagreement: OCHA and other UN actors did not perform full real‑time verification in Gaza the way they have in other conflicts; the Gaza health ministry’s reporting methods and source constraints (damaged infrastructure, unrecovered bodies, restricted access) limit independent verification; and combatants sometimes operate in civilian clothing or are embedded in institutions, complicating classification [3] [7] [2].
7. How to read the competing claims: transparency and agendas
Each data source carries potential biases or limitations: the Gaza ministry’s tallies are comprehensive but not disaggregated [5]; Israeli official statements claim higher combatant percentages but have been criticized for limited transparency and lack of verifiable evidence [6] [2]; and independent reviewers (media investigations, think tanks) either point to leaked data implying very high civilian proportions or caution that fatality data have become “completely unreliable” due to unknown methodologies [2] [7]. Readers should weigh methodological transparency and access constraints when evaluating any single percentage.
8. Bottom line and what is not in the record
There is no single, UN/WHO‑endorsed, independently verified civilian vs. combatant breakdown for Gaza as of December 2025 in the available reporting; UN OCHA publishes casualty counts but has not furnished a definitive verified split, and WHO has not published an independent combatant/civilian ratio [1] [4]. The most prominent contested figures are the Gaza ministry totals (large but not disaggregated) and the leaked IDF dataset that suggested an 83% civilian share—both cited above and disputed in commentary [5] [2]. Available sources do not mention a universally accepted, independently audited breakdown as of December 2025 [1] [7].
If you want, I can produce a side‑by‑side table of the principal figures and the exact methodological caveats each source lists (using only the documents above).