Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What is the current US border policy for asylum seekers as of 2025?
Executive summary
As of the sources available, U.S. asylum access in 2025 is a patchwork of new executive actions, court challenges, and statutory changes: President Trump’s January 20, 2025 proclamation and related measures seek to sharply limit or suspend asylum at the southern border, while parts of earlier rules (like the CLP presumptions for certain entrants) remain applied for specific entry dates and other changes — and multiple federal courts and agencies are actively litigating or staying implementation [1] [2] [3] [4]. Reporting from advocacy groups, human-rights organizations, and USCIS/DOJ materials show competing narratives about whether the right to seek asylum at the border still exists in practice, with litigation and administrative guidance producing different outcomes for different groups [5] [6] [2].
1. What the administration[7] have done: proclamations, MPP and CPB One changes
The Trump administration issued Proclamation 10888 on January 20, 2025, described by NGOs and legal observers as a move that “indefinitely suspends the right to seek asylum at the southern border,” and it also announced reimplementation of the Migrant Protection Protocols (Remain in Mexico) and shut down the CBP One app (rebranded CBP Home) that had been used for asylum appointments [6] [8] [1]. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International characterize these administrative steps as effectively “closing the door” to lawful asylum pathways and ending safe, orderly processing at the southern border [9] [5].
2. Statutory and regulatory changes: fee, CLP presumptions, and new law language
Congress and federal agencies implemented notable legal and fee changes in 2025. A new asylum fee (the first-ever annual asylum application fee) and steep increases on related immigration fees were introduced via legislation and Federal Register action, though courts and stays have affected whether those fees are currently charged in practice [3] [8]. Separately, the CLP rule (a presumption of asylum ineligibility for certain entrants between May 12, 2023 and May 11, 2025) is described on USCIS pages as having “sunsetted” on May 12, 2025 but remaining applicable to people who entered in that specific period while litigation continues [3] [2]. The text of 8 U.S.C. 1158 also shows statutory amendments in 2025 governing who “may apply for asylum” and provisions about removal to third countries, reflecting recent legislative activity cited in the codified statutes [4].
3. Courts, stays, and a fragmented implementation picture
Multiple sources note active litigation is reshaping what policies actually take effect. USCIS guidance says it will continue to apply CLP provisions to qualifying entrants “until the district court renders a decision,” and other reporting and legal briefs indicate federal judges have temporarily blocked or stayed some of the administration’s asylum restrictions [3] [8]. Advocacy groups and the IRC report federal courts temporarily blocking reintroduced programs like MPP or parts of the suspension of asylum, producing a situation where policy on the ground depends heavily on ongoing suits and local enforcement choices [6] [1].
4. Grounds of disagreement: legal right versus practical access
Legal and human-rights groups assert that the government’s actions have “effectively” eliminated the right to seek asylum at the border, citing halted apps, CBP operational changes, and proclamations [5] [9]. Government and USCIS materials portray a more technical picture: certain rules remain applied to specific cohorts, credible fear screening and referral procedures remain in place (e.g., expedited removal referrals to credible-fear interviews), and statutory asylum application paths continue to exist for those physically present or who arrive at ports of entry — but the availability of those paths is constrained by new administrative policy and litigation [2] [4] [3].
5. Practical effects for asylum seekers and backlog context
Advocacy organizations and USCIS statistics show a deep backlog that predates 2025 and complicates any policy shift: as of late 2024/early 2025, hundreds of thousands of affirmative asylum applications and millions of immigration-court cases were pending, meaning policy changes layer atop an already stressed system [1]. Groups report people stranded in border cities without CBP One appointments, widened use of return/expulsion policies, and renewed use of MPP-style waits in Mexico — all of which reduce practical access even where statutory rights remain [9] [6].
6. What’s omitted or unresolved in available reporting
Available sources do not mention a uniform national enforcement posture that fully resolves whether every element of the January 2025 measures is currently enforceable nationwide; instead, the record shows a mix of proclamations, agency guidance, and court orders that vary by case and jurisdiction (not found in current reporting). Also, while some sources report fee imposition and later court actions, exact nationwide status of the annual asylum fee and its refunds is described differently across documents [3] [8].
Bottom line: The legal right to request asylum still appears in statutes and agency procedures, but in 2025 administrative proclamations, reintroduced MPP-like rules, CBP operational changes, new fees, and extensive litigation have created a fractured, case-by-case reality in which practical access at the southern border is significantly constrained [4] [2] [6] [3].