Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Which us cities have the highest murder rates?
Executive Summary
The data provided by the assembled sources indicate that multiple U.S. cities — notably Chicago, Memphis, Los Angeles, Louisville, St. Louis, and others — appear regularly among those with the highest per-capita homicide rates or largest year‑to‑year increases, but rankings vary by dataset, definition, and population thresholds. Differences in methodology — including whether cities below 100,000 population are included, whether counts or rates per 100,000 residents are used, and which year[1] are compared — drive most apparent contradictions across the sources [2] [3] [4].
1. What the major claims say and why they conflict
The collected analyses make three broad claims: that Chicago topped one 2024 list of highest homicide rates, Memphis and Los Angeles featured prominently, and Louisville had higher per‑capita killings in certain FBI 2024 tabulations [2] [3]. Another claim highlights substantial year‑over‑year increases in specific cities, with Colorado Springs singled out for a 56% rise from 2023 to 2024 [5]. These statements conflict because they rely on differing denominators, city selections, and reporting windows; a city can record a large percent increase yet still have a lower absolute rate than perennial high‑rate cities [5] [3].
2. How different datasets define “highest” and why that matters
The distinction between absolute counts, per‑capita rates (per 100,000 residents), and percent change year‑to‑year matters for labeling a city “highest.” One dataset focuses on raw rankings of homicide rates across 30 cities for 2024, listing Chicago first [2]. Another uses FBI data constrained to cities of at least 100,000 people and reports Louisville above Chicago and Los Angeles on a per‑capita basis for 2024 [3]. A third examines relative increases in murders between 2023 and 2024, spotlighting Colorado Springs for the largest jump [5]. These measurement choices produce divergent “top” lists and public impressions.
3. City‑level examples that illustrate the divergence
Chicago, Memphis, and Los Angeles appear across analyses but occupy different positions depending on the metric: Chicago leads one 2024 list, Memphis is frequently near the top and also reported large violent‑crime burdens, while Louisville surpasses both on a per‑capita FBI compilation [2] [3] [6]. St. Louis is repeatedly called out for high homicide burdens and low clearance rates, underscoring that high murder rates can coincide with persistent unsolved cases [4]. Memphis is further noted to have both very high violent‑crime rates and recent year‑to‑year declines reported by some outlets [6].
4. Methodological caveats — what’s often omitted or obscured
Important methodological caveats surface across sources: some lists exclude municipalities under 100,000 residents (affecting per‑capita comparisons), others aggregate or standardize city boundaries differently, and some rely on preliminary FBI counts that are later revised [3] [7]. Several datasets emphasize violent crime broadly rather than homicide alone, and local reporting lags and definitional differences (city vs. metro vs. police jurisdiction) can materially alter rankings. These omissions explain much of the apparent contradiction among the provided claims [7] [3].
5. Timing and trend context: short spikes versus long‑term patterns
One source highlights large short‑term jumps — e.g., Colorado Springs’ 56% increase from 2023 to 2024 — while others present multi‑year comparisons or annual snapshots [5]. Short‑term percent changes can reflect small baseline counts in mid‑sized cities, producing dramatic percentage swings that do not necessarily signal a sustained long‑term trend. Conversely, cities with entrenched high homicide rates, like St. Louis or Memphis, show systemic patterns linked to socio‑economic conditions and policing challenges in multi‑year analyses [4] [6].
6. Political and agenda signals embedded in some claims
Several pieces frame crime changes in political terms: one report notes President Trump claiming credit for falling crime in Memphis after federal intervention plans, illustrating how crime statistics are used in political messaging [6]. Other coverage emphasizes law‑enforcement deficiencies and unsolved cases as calls for reform or increased resources, which can reflect advocacy agendas [4]. Readers should note when data are invoked to support policy prescriptions or electoral claims rather than as neutral description [6] [4].
7. Bottom line: how to interpret “which U.S. cities have the highest murder rates”
Given the source material, the clearest conclusion is that no single definitive ranking exists without specifying the metric, year, and population cutoff. Chicago, Memphis, Los Angeles, Louisville, and St. Louis are repeatedly identified among the highest‑burden locales in at least one authoritative dataset or reporting window, while other cities show sharp year‑to‑year increases like Colorado Springs [2] [3] [5] [4]. To answer the question precisely requires choosing a measure (rate vs. count vs. percent change), a year (e.g., 2024), and a population threshold; otherwise, multiple valid but differing lists will persist [2] [3] [5].