Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Which US cities have seen the largest decrease in murder rates from 2024 to 2025?
Executive Summary
The available reporting indicates a broad, measurable drop in homicides across many U.S. cities between 2024 and 2025, but the sources provided do not converge on a definitive ranked list of which specific cities saw the largest decreases. National summaries cite a 17% decline across 30 major cities and point to substantial city-level falls — some exceeding 30% in particular places — yet none of the supplied items present a complete, comparable table of 2024 versus 2025 murder-rate changes for all cities, leaving the precise “largest decreases” question unresolved [1] [2].
1. What the headline numbers say — Big-picture declines, few specifics
The clearest claim across these items is that homicides dropped notably in the 2024–2025 period, with one report quantifying a 17% decline and 327 fewer killings across a 30-city sample. That figure presents a strong national narrative that murder rates eased in many large cities within a one-year window, reflecting aggregated trend data rather than city-by-city comparisons. The 17% figure is from a July 2025 summary and emphasizes an overall reduction without identifying which municipalities contributed most to that decline, leaving room for interpretation about distribution and outliers [1].
2. City-level claims that attempt to name the biggest improvers
Several items claim particular cities experienced substantial declines. One set of analyses lists Baltimore, St. Louis, Cleveland, Denver, New Orleans, New York, Chicago, and Detroit among cities with large year-over-year drops, adding that some saw decreases in excess of 30%. Detroit is highlighted separately as having its lowest homicide count since 1965, attributed to coordinated policing and other local factors. These statements suggest notable heterogeneity in outcomes: while many cities fell, the magnitude varied and some jurisdictions seem to account for sizable shares of the aggregate decline [2] [3].
3. Gaps and methodological limitations across the reports
All supplied sources suffer from insufficient standardized, city-level breakdowns and inconsistent frames of reference. Some items refer to a 30-city sample, others to a broader "major cities" or nearly 200-city sample used in different years, and date ranges (2023 vs. 2024–2025) are sometimes conflated. The absence of a single, transparent dataset or common denominator means reported percentages (17%, 20.8%, and city-level “over 30%” drops) cannot be reconciled to produce a ranked list of the largest decreases without additional raw counts, population denominators, or exact time windows [1] [4] [2].
4. Conflicting timelines and how they change interpretation
Sources mix year-over-year comparisons for different intervals — some focus on 2023 declines, others on 2024–2025 movement — creating temporal ambiguity. A CNN item describes substantial 2023 declines in the largest cities, whereas more recent 2025 pieces summarize further reductions into 2024–2025. This layering matters because a city that plunged in 2023 might show a smaller incremental drop in 2024–2025, or vice versa. Without synchronized baselines and end dates, claims about which cities had the largest single-year decreases in 2024–2025 cannot be confirmed from these items alone [5] [4] [1].
5. Possible drivers and omitted context that affect rankings
Reports point to local policing tactics, coordinated citywide efforts, and broader national trends as explanatory factors for declines, but they omit systematic controls for other key influences: demographic shifts, changes in reporting practices, court and incarceration policies, and seasonal variation. Highlighting Detroit’s lowest homicide count since 1965 attributes some credit to policing changes, yet absence of cross-city controls prevents assessing whether similar strategies explain drops elsewhere or whether reductions reflect broader cyclical trends already underway before 2024 [3] [2].
6. Divergent source focuses reveal different agendas and strengths
The documents reflect varied aims: some emphasize national trend narratives and aggregate statistics, others promote local success stories or safety rankings for audience consumption. Aggregate-focused pieces present broad credibility on a downward trend, while city-focused items highlight exceptional local improvements. These emphases suggest potential agendas — national media highlighting recovery narratives versus local outlets emphasizing municipal success — which should caution readers to seek raw data and standardized methods before drawing definitive conclusions about rankings [1] [6] [7].
7. Conclusion — What can be stated and what remains unanswered
Based on the provided material, it is accurate to state that many U.S. cities experienced meaningful homicide declines in 2024–2025, with the aggregated sample showing a 17% drop and individual cities reporting larger reductions, including examples exceeding 30% and a notable historic low in Detroit. However, the supplied sources do not supply the consistent, city-level 2024 vs. 2025 murder-rate figures required to identify a ranked list of the top decliners; that question remains unanswered without access to the underlying datasets or a consolidated table of city-by-city counts and population-adjusted rates [1] [2] [3].