How do US courts handle sibling marriage cases?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
U.S. law uniformly treats marriages between biological siblings as void and—where defined—criminal, with nearly all states prohibiting incestuous marriage and criminalizing sexual relations between close blood relatives; some sources say all states bar sibling marriage and void it ab initio [1], while others note two states (New Jersey and Rhode Island) do not criminalize consensual adult incest though they still forbid marriage [2] [3].
1. Legal baseline: marriage between siblings is generally void and treated harshly
State family codes and statutory schemes commonly declare marriages between close blood relatives invalid from the start; legal guides and practice articles state that marriage between siblings is “void ab initio,” meaning the union confers no marital rights such as spousal property or support [1]. Professional overviews and state statutes cited by legal commentators emphasize that prohibitions against sibling marriage rest on long-standing statutory and common-law traditions aimed at public health and social norms [1] [4].
2. Criminal enforcement: most states criminalize incest, with penalties that vary
Most jurisdictions criminalize incestuous sexual relations between close relatives and apply prison terms or felony charges where statutes cover siblings; commentators cite examples such as Nevada prosecutions and potential multi-year sentences in states like California and Texas [5] [4]. Statutory language differs by state—some statutes criminalize the act of sexual intercourse or penetration, while others criminalize a broader range of sexual conduct or even the mere fact of marriage—so the precise criminal exposure depends on local law [6] [4].
3. Notable exceptions and statutory diversity: New Jersey and Rhode Island
Reporting and compilations of state law make clear there are exceptions: at least two states—New Jersey and Rhode Island—do not criminalize consensual incest between certain adults (with minimum-age caveats) but both still prohibit incestuous marriages [2] [3]. That split illustrates the point that criminalization and civil invalidity of marriage are distinct legal concepts and can diverge between states [3] [2].
4. Adoption and step-relations complicate the picture
Whether adoptive siblings or step-siblings may marry is a contested, state-specific question. Legal practice answers and state case law show some jurisdictions treat adopted siblings the same as biological siblings and therefore bar marriage, while other cases have allowed challenges and litigation to resolve licensing denials [7]. Federal guidance for immigration adjudication similarly flags that biological relationships like siblings affect visa recognition and that foreign marriages involving close relations can present validity issues [8].
5. Courts’ procedural role: voiding marriages, criminal trials, and child-welfare outcomes
When sibling marriages are presented to courts, typical judicial outcomes include declaring the marriage void, resolving collateral family-law disputes without recognizing spousal rights, and, where criminal statutes apply, conducting prosecutions that can include prison or other criminal penalties [1] [5]. If children result from such unions, family courts and child-protection agencies often focus on the children’s welfare and may remove parental rights—commentators note child-welfare intervention is a common consequence [1].
6. Conflicts of law: out‑of‑state and foreign marriages
Courts sometimes confront marriages valid where performed but prohibited at home. State and federal guidance shows courts and agencies may recognize a foreign marriage for some purposes even if the same union would be void under local law—examples include past appellate recognition of certain cousin marriages performed abroad—so outcomes can depend on domicile, choice-of-law rules, and the exact statutory language at issue [8]. Reporting underlines that recognition for immigration or domestic effects is assessed case-by-case [8].
7. Where reporting disagrees and what’s not settled
Sources differ on absolutist summaries: one legal primer asserts “all states explicitly prohibit marriages between siblings” [1], while state-by-state compilations and encyclopedic summaries note statutory exceptions in New Jersey and Rhode Island and identify variations in how incest is defined and punished [2] [3]. Available sources do not mention uniform federal criminalization of sibling marriage; instead, treatment is a patchwork of state statutes and judicial decisions [3] [1].
8. Bottom line for litigants, clerks and advocates
Clerks, couples, and lawyers must check the specific state statute and case law: some states void a sibling marriage automatically, some add criminal exposure, and a few jurisdictions allow consensual adult sexual relations while still forbidding marriage [1] [2] [3]. For immigration, adoption, child-welfare, or license‑denial disputes, courts and agencies analyze both the form of the relationship and the forum law; litigants should expect varied outcomes across state lines [8] [7].
Limitations: this summary relies on the provided state overviews and legal commentary; it does not attempt an exhaustive, current state-by-state table and available sources do not mention any federal statute that directly governs sibling marriage [1] [3].