Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are the victimization rates for homicide by race in the US?
Executive summary
Recent sources show large, persistent racial gaps in U.S. homicide victimization: multiple compilations and analyses report Black Americans experiencing homicide victimization rates many times higher than White Americans — examples include a Black rate of about 26 per 100,000 versus White rates around 3–4 per 100,000 in 2023 data cited by several outlets [1] [2] [3]. Scholarly work also highlights very high rates for American Indian and Alaska Native males and for Black males aged 15–44 [4] [5].
1. What the headline numbers say — racial disparities are large
Recent compilations and reporting place Black homicide-victimization rates roughly an order of magnitude above some White estimates: The Global Statistics summaries cite Black rates near the mid-20s per 100,000 and White rates around 3.3–3.9 per 100,000, producing ratios often reported as roughly 6–9 to 1 depending on the exact series [3] [2] [1]. The Violence Policy Center’s synthesis using CDC mortality data reports a Black victimization rate of 26.6 per 100,000 in 2023 versus 3.9 for White victims, and that Black victims comprised more than half of U.S. homicide victims in 2023 despite being a smaller share of the population [2].
2. Nuance by sex and age — young men bear the heaviest burden
Both advocacy reporting and peer‑reviewed work stress that the disparity concentrates among males and younger age groups: the Black male homicide victimization rate has been reported far above the overall male rate (for example, 46.1 per 100,000 for Black males versus 11.3 overall male victims in one compilation) [2]. The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) analysis likewise finds American Indian/Alaska Native and Black males aged 15–44 have the highest homicide rates across race/ethnicity × sex × age cells [4] [5].
3. Multiple data sources, multiple methods — numbers vary but direction is consistent
Estimates come from different datasets (CDC mortality data, FBI counts, BJS reports, modeled GBD estimates) and from secondary aggregators; absolute rates and ratio magnitudes therefore vary across reports. The Global Statistics pages present similar patterns to the Violence Policy Center and to broader syntheses, but publish slightly different point estimates and projections [3] [1] [6]. The JAMA Network Open/GBD study uses small‑area estimation to produce county‑ and demographic‑specific rates for 2000–2019, adding methodological depth to national snapshots [4] [5].
4. What’s driving disparities — context offered by the literature
Authors and analysts link racial disparities to concentrated social, economic, and structural factors and to intraracial patterns of violence; reporting notes firearms are more commonly used in homicides with Black victims, and most homicides are intraracial (victims and offenders sharing race) when that information is known [2] [7]. Scholarly work emphasizes that age interacts with race — non‑White populations show stronger age associations with homicide risk, leading to disproportionate years of life lost [8].
5. Limits, uncertainties, and why single numbers can mislead
Available sources show variation in year, source, and method: some figures are 2023 counts (CDC/FBI) while others are modeled estimates through 2019 or projections into 2025 [5] [3] [2]. The Global Statistics pages are secondary aggregators and sometimes present projections or syntheses; peer‑reviewed GBD outputs and official federal reports (BJS, CDC, FBI) provide different levels of transparency and methodology [4] [9] [10]. Available sources do not mention a single, universally agreed “current” table for victimization rates by every race/ethnicity and sex for 2024–2025; therefore users should expect differences depending on the source [1] [5].
6. Practical takeaway for readers and researchers
If you want a conservative, peer‑reviewed baseline for demographic patterns, consult the GBD/JAMA Network Open analysis and CDC/FBI/BJS primary reports for raw counts and mortality rates; these consistently show Black and American Indian/Alaska Native populations — especially young men — facing the highest homicide rates [4] [5] [2]. Use caution with secondary compilations and projections (e.g., some online “2025” tables) and check methodology and year when comparing ratios such as “Black are X times White” because those multipliers shift with dataset and year [3] [1].
Sources cited in this summary: The Global Statistics pages and projections [1] [3] [6], Bureau of Justice Statistics / Homicide Victimization reporting [9] [10], JAMA Network Open / GBD study and dataset [4] [5] [11], Violence Policy Center summary using CDC mortality counts [2], and contextual literature on race and crime [7] [8].