Which high-profile U.S. mass shootings since 2010 were attributed to far-right extremists?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Since 2010, multiple high‑profile U.S. mass shootings have been attributed to far‑right extremists; ADL and media analyses identify incidents such as the 2015 Charleston church shooting (9 Black parishioners killed), the 2018 Tree of Life synagogue massacre (11 killed) and large 2022 attacks in Buffalo (10 Black shoppers killed) and Colorado Springs (5 killed at an LGBTQ nightclub) as motivated by white supremacist or other right‑wing ideologies [1] [2] [3]. ADL and academic reviews report that right‑wing extremists were responsible for the majority of extremist‑linked mass‑casualty events in the 2010s and early 2020s [4] [3] [5].
1. A clear pattern: far‑right actors dominate extremist mass‑killings in recent years
Reporting and NGO analyses show a distinct pattern: right‑wing and white‑supremacist attackers account for most extremist‑linked mass‑casualty shootings since 2010. The Anti‑Defamation League’s research and coverage summarized by FiveThirtyEight and Axios states right‑wing extremists committed the majority of extremist‑related killings in the last decade, with particularly deadly incidents concentrated in racially or ethnically motivated attacks [4] [3]. Homeland Preparedness News cites ADL figures that from 2010 onward right‑wing extremists were linked to a large majority of extremist murders [5].
2. High‑profile cases repeatedly cited by analysts
Specific, widely cited episodes include Dylann Roof’s 2015 Charleston church massacre that killed nine Black worshippers, the 2018 Tree of Life synagogue attack that killed 11 Jewish worshippers, the 2019 El Paso Walmart massacre in which an anti‑immigrant manifesto accompanied 23 deaths, and the 2022 Buffalo supermarket shooting that killed 10 Black shoppers — all attributed to white‑supremacist or anti‑immigrant motives in reporting and ADL analysis [1] [2] [3]. Coverage and NGO reporting position these events as representative of the lethal consequences of far‑right radicalization [4] [3].
3. Why researchers single out the period since 2010
Analysts point to a marked increase in extremist‑linked mass killings in the 2010s compared with prior decades: ADL’s work found 164 deaths in ideological extremist‑related mass killings between 2010 and 2020 — a sharp rise over earlier decades — and attributes much of that rise to white‑supremacist mass shootings [3] [2]. FiveThirtyEight summarizes that right‑wing extremists were behind most extremist‑linked killings across the 2010–2021 period, with the exception of some Islamist‑inspired attacks such as the 2016 Pulse nightclub shooting [4].
4. Multiple data streams converge — but definitions differ
Scholars and NGOs use different data sets and definitions (mass killing vs. mass shooting vs. extremist‑linked murder), yet independent sources converge on the core finding that far‑right actors account for a disproportionate share of extremist mass killings in recent years [6] [4] [7]. This complicates direct counting: one dataset may track ideological motive, another codes hate crime indicators, and official tallies can lag as investigations uncover motives over months or years [8].
5. Alternate viewpoints and limits of current reporting
Some academic work emphasizes motive complexity: not all mass shooters fit neat ideological categories, and attackers sometimes mix personal grievances with extremist ideas — a nuance highlighted in peer‑reviewed analysis of extremist and mass‑shooter motivations [6]. Available sources do not mention a comprehensive, single‑list in this package enumerating every U.S. mass shooting since 2010 attributed to far‑right extremists; readers should be cautious extrapolating from headline cases without consulting primary databases [6] [7].
6. What this means for public debate and policy
News outlets and the ADL frame the trend as a shifting terrorism threat, with white‑supremacist violence described as the main domestic extremist danger going forward, especially in mass‑shooting form [2] [4]. That framing affects policy priorities: resource allocation toward monitoring far‑right networks and addressing racially motivated hate crimes follows directly from the pattern identified in ADL and journalistic analyses [2] [3].
7. How to follow the record: sources to consult next
For ongoing clarity, consult the ADL’s “Murder and Extremism” reports and the datasets used by academic studies of extremist crimes and mass shootings; these sources document year‑by‑year counts, motives and how incidents are classified — and they note revisions as motives become clear over time [8] [7]. Journalistic summaries from FiveThirtyEight and Axios synthesize those reports into readable narratives that identify the most cited high‑profile cases linked to far‑right ideology [4] [3].
Limitations: this analysis relies only on the provided reporting and academic snippets; a complete, annotated roster of every U.S. mass shooting since 2010 attributed to far‑right extremists is not included in the sources supplied here (not found in current reporting).