Are there any notable cases of serial killers in the medical profession in the United States in 2022?

1. What 2022 reporting actually covered: pattern analysis and media, not new high-profile convictions

Major items surfaced in 2022 were analytical and media treatments of healthcare serial killing — scholarly reviews like “Brave Clarice” and statistical critiques (RSS report) examined motives, detection problems and the rarity of proven cases, while popular media revisited historical cases such as Charles Cullen through films and coverage; these sources do not document a newly convicted U.S. medical serial killer in 2022 ^{[2] [4] [1]}.

2. Why healthcare serial killing attracts renewed attention

Scholars and journalists point to unique detection problems: victims tend to be elderly or terminally ill, deaths can appear natural, and proving causation and intent demands extensive medical and statistical expertise; that combination makes healthcare serial killing both rare and often only recognized retrospectively, a theme emphasized in academic reviews from 2022 ^{[2] [4]}.

3. Historical U.S. examples remain central in coverage

When the subject appears in popular and academic outlets the focus is often historical — for example, Charles Cullen is repeatedly cited as among the most prolific U.S. healthcare serial killers and was the subject of renewed public attention in 2022 via film and reporting — illustrating why past cases dominate conversations about “medical” serial killers rather than new 2022 convictions ^{[1] [5]}.

4. The scholarly consensus: rare but distinct and difficult to prosecute

Forensic and legal literature compiled in 2022 emphasizes two consistent points: healthcare serial killings are a minuscule fraction of medical professionals worldwide, and successfully prosecuting such cases requires proving both that the death was unnatural and that the practitioner’s actions caused it — burdens that are often hard to meet when victims have high baseline mortality ^{[4] [2] [3]}.

5. Statistical and investigative traps highlighted in 2022 analysis

The 2022 Royal Statistical Society report warned about misinterpretation of statistical “spikes” and confirmation bias in investigations of suspected medical killers: awareness that a provider is suspected can change how deaths are classified, risking both false positives and negatives; the report stresses careful, expert-led statistical work in these probes ^[4].

6. Competing viewpoints in the sources

Academic reviews and advocacy/encyclopedic treatments diverge in emphasis: forensic literature stresses rarity plus prosecutorial difficulty and the need for methodical investigation ^{[2] [3]}, while popular media and true-crime pieces underscore the shock value and frequency perception of “medical killers,” sometimes implying higher prevalence than rigorous reviews support ^{[1] [5] [6]}.

7. What the available sources do not say

Available sources do not mention any specific, newly convicted U.S. doctor or nurse in 2022 meeting the common definitions of a serial killer; they focus on retrospective analyses, historic cases, and methodological issues in identifying healthcare serial murder rather than reporting new 2022 convictions ^{[2] [4] [1]}.

8. How to interpret public concern going forward

Given the detection challenges and media attention, vigilance and improved institutional oversight are recurrent recommendations in the literature: better statistical methods, routine review of mortality patterns, and multidisciplinary investigations are prescribed to distinguish rare but real cases from coincidence or misclassification ^{[4] [2] [7]}.

Limitations: this summary relies only on the supplied set of sources; local law-enforcement press releases or cases not covered in these documents may exist but are not found in current reporting ^{[4] [2]}.