Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which U.S. states report the highest levels of hate crimes per capita?
Executive summary
The most authoritative nationwide counts come from the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) hate crime data compiled in the annual FBI report and summarized by the Department of Justice; those sources show total incidents rising into the multiple thousands in recent years (for example, roughly 7,759 incidents cited by secondary reporting) but do not provide a simple, current ranked list of states by hate crimes per capita in the search results provided here [1] [2]. State-level per‑capita rankings require combining FBI/state counts with population denominators; the Justice Department’s state data page exists but the specific per‑state per‑capita ranking is not included in the documents you provided [3] [1].
1. What the national data actually say — totals and trends
The FBI/DOJ reporting framework records bias‑motivated incidents nationally and shows an upward trend in recent years: one data visualization cited 7,759 reported hate‑crime incidents in a recent year and noted a roughly 6% increase compared with earlier years [2]. The DOJ’s Community Relations Service overview of the FBI’s 2023 report highlights topic breakdowns (race, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability) and noted that hate crime incidents increased by 228 in 2023 compared to the prior year [4]. These national totals are useful context but do not answer which states have the highest per‑capita rates without further calculation [2] [4].
2. Why per‑capita rankings are not straightforward in the available sources
Per‑capita hate‑crime rankings require two pieces of data: accurate incident counts by state and reliable state population figures. The DOJ hosts a “State Data” page intended to provide state breakdowns of reported hate‑crime counts [3], and the FBI’s UCR hate‑crime pages contain the incident reports [5] [1], but none of the search snippets you supplied include a direct, precomputed table or chart that ranks states by incidents per 100,000 residents. That means the materials in your search set enable per‑capita ranking only if one downloads the state counts and performs population adjustments; the downloaded reports or underlying tables are not reproduced in the snippets here [3] [1].
3. Reporting limitations that skew state comparisons
Both DOJ and civil‑society analysts warn that underreporting and inconsistent participation by local agencies complicate state comparisons. The Anti‑Defamation League and the DOJ note that dozens of large cities and police departments may not fully report hate‑crime data to federal aggregators, which biases state totals downward and unevenly [6]. International monitoring (ODIHR) and the FBI itself have also recommended improved data collection and coordination to make state and national comparisons more reliable [7]. In short: higher reported per‑capita rates can reflect better reporting, denser populations of targeted groups, or real differences in incidence — the provided sources do not disentangle those causes [6] [7].
4. Which groups and motivations drive the totals — and why that matters for state rankings
The FBI/Statista summaries show that the majority of reported hate crimes are motivated by race, ethnicity or ancestry (about 63.7% in one summary) with religion, sexual orientation, and gender identity also significant contributors; anti‑Black, anti‑Jewish and anti‑LGBTQ+ incidents are repeatedly cited as the largest categories [2] [8] [4]. States with larger populations of particular targeted groups, or with recent localized events, can therefore show higher per‑capita rates for certain motivations — a nuance lost in a single statewide per‑capita number [2] [4].
5. Alternative data sources and caveats you should consider
Civil‑society trackers such as the SPLC’s hate‑map and ADL’s hate‑crime tracking can provide complementary views (including per‑capita measures for hate‑group presence), but those sources also note geographic and methodological limits; SPLC emphasizes per‑capita trends in hate‑group presence, not necessarily law‑enforcement‑recorded hate‑crime incidents [9] [10] [6]. Visual and third‑party summaries (for example, Statista and Visual Capitalist) illustrate national trends and categories but rely on FBI numbers and should be used together with raw state counts for per‑capita calculations [2] [11].
6. How to get a defensible state per‑capita ranking (actionable next steps)
To produce a reliable ranking you should: (a) retrieve the most recent state incident counts from the DOJ State Data page or the FBI UCR hate‑crime tables, (b) use a consistent population denominator (Census state population for the same reporting year), and (c) flag jurisdictions known to underreport (cross‑check city/agency participation lists). The materials you provided point to the DOJ and FBI sources as the authoritative starting points but do not themselves include a ready‑made per‑state per‑capita ranking [3] [1] [5].
Limitations: available sources do not present a direct list of U.S. states ranked by hate crimes per capita in the snippets you provided; the conclusions above are drawn from the DOJ/FBI summaries and third‑party visualizations cited [1] [4] [2] [3] [5].