Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Which states have the highest and lowest violent crime rates regardless of party affiliation?
Executive Summary
Available summaries of state-level violent crime point consistently to New Mexico, Alaska, and the District of Columbia as among the highest, and Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire as among the lowest, but sources differ on exact ranking and methodology. Variation stems from differing datasets, whether jurisdictions like D.C. are counted as “states,” and how recent FBI or compiled metrics are interpreted [1] [2] [3].
1. Bold claims about “safest” and “most dangerous” states that appear across reports
Multiple analyses assert clear top/bottom lists: one 2025 roundup names New Hampshire as the safest and lists New Mexico among the least safe, while a separate mapping of FBI 2022 data highlights the District of Columbia and New Mexico at the top of violent-crime rates and Maine at the bottom [2] [1]. These claims rely on composite metrics or direct FBI incident rates; the narrative is consistent that a small set of states repeatedly appears at the extremes, but the exact ordering shifts with methodology and inclusion of non-state jurisdictions [2] [1].
2. Which places show the highest violent crime rates, according to these sources?
One analysis using FBI 2022 figures identifies D.C. at 812 per 100,000 and New Mexico at 780 per 100,000, with Alaska also repeatedly named as high-crime in other summaries, while multi-factor safety rankings list New Mexico, Louisiana, Colorado, Arkansas, and Washington among the least safe in 2025 compilations [1] [2]. The recurring pattern is that New Mexico and D.C. top several lists, but whether Alaska appears depends on source selection and whether property crime and other safety dimensions are blended into the ranking [3] [2].
3. Which states show the lowest violent crime rates in these analyses?
Across the supplied material, Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire are consistently cited as the low end of violent crime rates, with one source placing Maine at 103 incidents per 100,000 based on FBI 2022 data [1] [2]. Composite “safest state” rankings for 2025 also place Maine and New Hampshire at the top, sometimes joined by Idaho, Rhode Island, and Connecticut when broader safety measures (financial, road, workplace) are included. The common signal is that New England states dominate the low-crime end of multiple lists [2].
4. What do the summaries say about party affiliation and crime?
One source explicitly examines party affiliation and finds no significant difference in violent crime rates between “red” and “blue” states, arguing that factors like poverty and demographics better explain variation than state-level party control [4]. This contrasts with politically framed claims about “crime in blue cities” or “law and order” narratives; the provided analyses emphasize structural socio-economic drivers rather than partisan governance as the primary correlates with violent crime [4] [5].
5. Why do different reports produce different state rankings?
Differences arise from data choice, time frame, and unit of analysis: some pieces use FBI Uniform Crime Reporting for a single year [6], others compile multi-factor safety indexes that combine violent and property crime with non-crime indicators, and some include D.C. and territories while others restrict to the 50 states [1] [2]. Methodological choices—per-capita rates vs. raw counts, homicide vs. broader violent crime, single-year spikes vs. multi-year averages—yield different “top” and “bottom” lists, explaining why New Mexico appears on most high-crime lists while Alaska and Louisiana vary by study.
6. City-level realities complicate state-level summaries and political messaging
Several sources note that city homicide counts and rates differ from statewide patterns; Chicago’s raw homicide totals do not translate into the highest homicide rate per capita, and cities like New Orleans, Memphis, St. Louis, and Baltimore register very high homicide rates even if their states do not top statewide violent-crime lists [7] [5]. This tension allows selective political narratives—focusing on cities or states—to emphasize different problems, while the underlying data shows concentrated urban hotspots can coexist with lower statewide averages [7] [5].
7. What the supplied analyses agree and where uncertainty remains
The supplied documents converge on a few consistent points: New Mexico and D.C. are repeatedly identified as high violent-crime jurisdictions, and Maine and New England states sit at the low end; party affiliation is a weak explanatory variable compared with poverty and other structural drivers [1] [2] [4]. Remaining uncertainty stems from the use of composite safety rankings versus raw FBI incident rates, differing publication dates and data years, and whether non-state jurisdictions are counted, which together can change exact placements in any top/bottom list [2] [1].
8. Bottom line for the original question—highest and lowest violent crime rates regardless of party
Based on the supplied analyses, the best-supported statement is: the highest violent-crime rates are reported for the District of Columbia and New Mexico (with Alaska often cited), while the lowest rates are reported for Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire. These conclusions rest on FBI 2022 rate data and 2025 safety compilations, but readers should note methodological caveats—especially the inclusion of D.C. and the distinction between single-year rates and composite safety rankings—when interpreting any definitive “most/least violent” list [1] [2].