How can I find official USCIS records or case status for Lucia Lopez Belloza?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Available reporting shows Any Lucía López Belloza, a 19‑year‑old Babson College freshman, was detained at Boston Logan on Nov. 20 and ultimately deported to Honduras within about 48 hours; ICE and DHS say a 2015 removal order existed while her lawyer says government databases show the case “closed in 2017” and that she was not shown paperwork [1] [2] [3]. Multiple outlets report a federal judge issued an emergency order on Nov. 21 barring her removal or transfer outside Massachusetts — and her lawyer and several news organizations say she was removed despite that order [4] [5] [6].
1. What the public record in news reporting currently shows
News accounts consistently report the same sequence: Lopez Belloza attempted to board a flight from Boston to Texas on Nov. 20, was detained by immigration authorities, moved through ICE custody in multiple locations, and was flown to Honduras roughly two days later [1] [7] [2]. DHS/ICE statements cited by outlets say an immigration judge ordered her removed in 2015 [7] [5]. Her attorney, Todd Pomerleau, says he could not find an accessible removal order in government databases and that records he found showed the case closed in 2017 [3] [2].
2. Conflicting official claims versus counsel’s findings
There is a sharp factual dispute in reporting: DHS/ICE told outlets there was a removal order from 2015 [7] [5]. Pomerleau, cited by CNN and other outlets, says he found no accessible record of that order and that the only government record he located showed the matter closed in 2017 [3] [2]. Available sources do not include a published copy of the 2015 removal order or the specific database entries Pomerleau consulted; those primary documents are not reproduced in the reporting sampled here [3] [2].
3. The emergency court order and the removal timing
Multiple outlets report a federal judge issued an emergency order on Nov. 21 directing that Lopez Belloza not be removed from the United States or transferred out of Massachusetts for at least 72 hours [5] [4]. Government filings cited by reporting argue a lack of jurisdiction because, by the time the Boston order issued, Lopez Belloza was already outside Massachusetts or en route — a point prosecutors used to justify the removal [4] [6]. Reporting indicates the government says once she was removed from custody and released in Honduras, the court’s procedural objections changed the remedies available [4].
4. Practical avenues to find official USCIS / immigration records
Available reporting does not provide step‑by‑step USCIS or EOIR (Executive Office for Immigration Review) case‑lookup details tied to Lopez Belloza’s file; that material is not found in current reporting (not found in current reporting). Journalistic sources reflect two practical facts: attorneys typically search federal immigration court databases and DHS/ICE records; and lawyers sometimes obtain filings (habeas petitions, emergency orders) filed in federal court that reference agency records [3] [4]. For anyone seeking official records, the articles make clear that counsel, court filings, or Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests are the commonly used routes — but the news pieces here do not show a completed FOIA or an uploaded immigration judge order [3] [4].
5. Legal and tactical context reporters highlight
Legal experts quoted in coverage frame this case as an example of rapid ICE transfers that can frustrate judicial oversight: moving a person geographically can affect which court has jurisdiction and can limit immediate relief such as temporary restraining orders [8] [7]. The reporting shows two competing frames: the government frames the action as enforcement of a long‑standing removal order [7]; advocates and Lopez Belloza’s counsel frame it as opaque, possibly unlawful removal while she was pursuing review and while a judge had ordered her stay [2] [6].
6. What reporting does not answer and next steps for verification
Available sources do not publish the underlying immigration judge’s 2015 order, the EOIR docket printout, ICE custody transfer logs, or the exact database entries Pomerleau reviewed; those documents are not found in current reporting (not found in current reporting). To verify official status, reporting suggests the next reliable steps are: obtain the EOIR docket or administrative record through counsel, seek copies of the immigration judge’s order and ICE custody/transfer records, or file FOIA/Privacy Act requests with DHS/ICE and USCIS — avenues mentioned in legal coverage though not executed in the articles cited here [3] [4].
Limitations: this analysis relies solely on the news reporting assembled above and does not review court dockets, agency records, or FOIA releases that may exist beyond these articles [3] [4] [5]. Competing factual claims are documented in the cited reporting; primary agency orders and database prints are not included in these sources [2] [7].