How have U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) changed ceremony procedures after past disruptions?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
USCIS has revised ceremony procedures repeatedly: its Policy Manual (12 USCIS‑PM J.5) codifies check‑in rules, facility selection and who performs check‑in and certificate presentation — including limits that “only USCIS officers shall perform the ceremony check‑in process” and that venues be indoor and vetted [1] [2]. In late 2025 USCIS guidance and memos introduced new vetting pauses and holds that led to mass last‑minute cancellations for applicants from 19 “high‑risk” countries, prompting local pushback and litigation threats [3] [4] [5].
1. How USCIS structures ceremonies now: formal check‑in and venue rules
USCIS’s Policy Manual lays out a formal, centralized ceremony playbook: Field Offices approve venues (often indoor, accessible spaces), may conduct site visits, and retain control over program order; the manual specifically reserves ceremony check‑in and certificate presentation to USCIS officers or leadership — not outside contractors — to preserve neutrality and control process [1] [2].
2. Administrative updates: procedural wording and voter‑registration language
Recent policy updates revise specific ceremony sections (check‑in process, subsections C–J) and adjust language around services offered at ceremonies; one visible change was reworking guidance on offering voter‑registration services at the end of administrative naturalization ceremonies to emphasize non‑partisanship in light of executive‑order action earlier in 2025 [6] [7].
3. Operational controls intended to ensure neutrality and security
Contract language and USCIS policy emphasize neutrality and control: venue requirements, interior facilities, audio/visual needs, and the stipulation that only USCIS personnel handle core ceremony tasks indicate an intent to standardize experiences and limit outside influence at events where new citizens are formally recognized [2] [1].
4. Past disruptions that forced procedure changes: cancellations and new vetting holds
Multiple outlets reported a wave of last‑minute cancellations in late 2025 after USCIS placed holds on adjudication for people from 19 countries and froze many asylum applications for “comprehensive review” and heightened vetting; those holds caused ceremonies to be canceled or individuals turned away even after receiving oath notices [3] [8] [4].
5. How USCIS responded in practice: holds, re‑screening, and pause memos
USCIS publicly described a pause and re‑screening process for applicants from the listed countries while it “works to ensure ... vetted and screened to the maximum degree possible,” and the agency issued a policy memorandum — described in reporting as imposing a “hold and review” — that was tied to broader screening and security initiatives [8] [9] [3].
6. Consequences for applicants: cancellations, confusion, and legal pushback
The operational pause produced real‑world effects: candidates arrived at events like Faneuil Hall only to be turned away or learn of cancellations via online portals; advocacy groups and state officials (e.g., New York AG) demanded explanations and reversals, framing the cancellations as abrupt and injurious to long‑planned ceremonies [4] [5].
7. Competing explanations in reporting: security vs. administrative action
USCIS framed the changes as security‑driven vetting and adherence to new executive directives; advocacy groups and legal blogs described the pattern as a broader “crackdown,” attributing cancellations to new vetting centers, nationality‑based holds, and last‑minute re‑screening — reporting that paints the moves as both procedural (policy memos) and enforcement‑oriented [3] [10] [8].
8. What the Policy Manual still says — and what reporting uncovered
USCIS’s official manual continues to stress ceremony procedures and who conducts them (check‑in by USCIS officers, venue standards), while contemporaneous reporting documents an overlay of new operational holds that can override the typical sequence — meaning formal ceremony rules remain, but agency vetting practices introduced additional, often last‑minute, interruptions [1] [3] [4].
9. Limitations and unanswered questions in current reporting
Available sources document policy text and the December 2025 wave of holds and cancellations, but they do not provide granular, agency‑wide statistics on how many ceremonies were canceled nationwide or detailed internal criteria for placing individual cases on hold; available sources do not mention precise internal algorithms or specific AI tools USCIS may use [1] [3] [10].
10. What applicants and advocates should watch next
Given the coexistence of a detailed Policy Manual and separate vetting memos, affected people and advocates should monitor USCIS policy‑updates pages and published memos for narrow procedural changes (voter‑registration language, check‑in rules) and watch reporting and agency memos for any expansion or rollback of nationality‑based holds; legal challenges and state inquiries (e.g., NY AG letter) suggest policy reversals or clarifications could follow [7] [5] [3].
Sources cited: USCIS Policy Manual and updates on administrative ceremonies [1] [7] [6]; venue/contract statement of work [2]; reporting on cancellations and holds (TIME [8]; Reuters [3]; GBH p1_s5); legal/advocacy commentary and analysis [10] [9] [5].