What compensation awards did international tribunals actually issue to companies after Venezuela's 2007 nationalizations and which remain unpaid?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Venezuela’s 2007 nationalizations spawned a string of international arbitration awards—most notably ConocoPhillips’ multi-billion dollar wins and ExxonMobil’s mixed ICC/ICSID results—but the bulk of those awards have not been satisfied and remain difficult to enforce [1] [2]. Tribunals issued clear monetary awards (Exxon: ICC $907.6m and an ICSID $1.6bn award later annulled in large part; Conoco: ICSID/ICC awards aggregating roughly $10.7bn), yet payments have been partial or contested and many remain effectively unpaid [3] [4] [1] [2].
1. The headline awards: ConocoPhillips and the $10.7 billion tally
ConocoPhillips is the largest single corporate victor arising from the 2007 oil-sector nationalizations: tribunals have issued awards that brought Conoco’s total recoveries under two different arbitration tracks to about $10.7 billion, including a World Bank (ICSID) decision ordering Venezuela to pay “more than $8 billion” in a 2019 ruling [1]. That 2019 ICSID ruling followed earlier partial decisions and ICC outcomes and stands as the biggest outstanding legal money judgement against Venezuela from the 2007 wave [2] [1].
2. ExxonMobil: two awards, one largely undone and the other partially paid
ExxonMobil pursued both ICC and ICSID routes after Cerro Negro and related projects were taken in 2007 and secured an ICC award of roughly $907.6 million in 2012 [3]. An ICSID tribunal later issued an approximately $1.6 billion award in 2014, but parts of that decision were subsequently annulled and the matter has been the subject of follow-on enforcement litigation and deduction claims by PDVSA, meaning Exxon has received only portions of these awards to date and has sought recognition in U.S. courts [4] [1] [5]. Reuters reporting noted PDVSA expected to reduce what it pays Exxon by setoffs and previously paid smaller amounts such as a reported $255 million payment tied to one ruling [4] [6].
3. Other corporate settlements: some paid, others disputed
Not every nationalization claim ended in unpaid judgements. France’s Total and Norway’s StatoilHydro were reported to have received about $1 billion in compensation after negotiating reduced holdings, and Verizon’s 28.5% stake in CANTV was bought out for $572 million in 2007—examples where payment was effected or settlements reached [7]. But the larger oil majors that litigated aggressively—Conoco and Exxon—have driven the biggest arbitration awards and the most acute enforcement questions [7] [1].
4. Why most awards remain unpaid in practice
A recurring theme in coverage is enforceability: ICC panels and ICSID tribunals can issue awards, but they do not themselves seize assets inside Venezuela; claimants must pursue enforcement through domestic courts or against state commercial assets abroad, a difficult and protracted process made harder by Venezuela’s declining oil production and cash flows [2] [1]. Reuters and related reporting note that despite tribunal victories, “more than 20 international arbitration claims” stemming from the 2007 nationalizations remain largely unpaid, reflecting both legal setbacks (annulments or setoffs) and political-economic constraints on Venezuela’s ability or willingness to pay [1] [2].
5. The factual bottom line
Tribunals issued major awards: Exxon’s ICC award of about $907.6 million and an ICSID award later reported at $1.6 billion that faced annulment and offsets [3] [4]; ConocoPhillips’ combined tribunal awards aggregating to roughly $10.7 billion with an ICSID order of more than $8 billion among them [1] [2]. Some awards have been partially paid or settled (Total, StatoilHydro, Verizon examples) while China/PDVSA setoffs, annulments and Venezuela’s fiscal crisis mean the largest awards remain effectively unpaid or under contested enforcement [7] [6] [1] [2]. Reporting limitations prevent a line-by-line ledger of payments and outstanding balances for every claimant beyond what the cited sources document.