How do Social Security and pension administrators verify an informal marriage for survivor benefits?

Checked on January 18, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Social Security verifies informal (common‑law or non‑ceremonial) marriages by requiring the applicant to prove a legally valid marriage under applicable state law and by collecting documentary and sworn statements when standard marriage certificates are unavailable [1] [2]. The SSA accepts alternative evidence—joint financial records, declarations, and third‑party statements—and will recognize a common‑law marriage if it was valid where it began even if the couple later moved, but the precise proofs and the burden of proof follow internal POMS rules and vary by circumstance [3] [4].

1. How the SSA frames the question: is the relationship a marriage?

The SSA’s survivor‑benefit framework starts with a binary legal question—was the claimant the deceased worker’s spouse under law—and so applicants must establish dates, places and the legal status of any marriage on forms such as SSA‑2 and SSA‑10 and in agency guidance on survivors [5] [6] [7].

2. Preferred proof: the marriage certificate and official documents

The SSA lists an original marriage certificate as the preferred proof and asks applicants to provide birth certificates, Social Security numbers, and documents showing how prior marriages ended; when originals are required the agency will generally request to see them in person and will return them [1] [5].

3. When the certificate is missing: alternative evidence the SSA will accept

Agency policy and practitioner guides make clear that when a ceremonial certificate is not available the SSA will accept alternative evidence including signed statements about the marriage, sworn affidavits from clergy or public officials, and other documentary proof such as joint tax returns, joint bank accounts, insurance policies and other records that show the couple openly presented themselves as married [1] [8].

4. Common‑law marriages: whose state law matters

Recognition of common‑law marriages is governed by state law: the SSA will recognize a common‑law marriage for federal survivor benefits if the marriage was valid under the law of the state where it began (or where it was valid), which means claimants in states that recognize informal marriages need to prove the state’s requirements were met [3] [9].

5. The mechanics: apply as a spouse and assemble evidence

Practically, applicants apply for survivor benefits as a spouse and then substantiate that status with the required documentation—using SSA forms and, if necessary, the agency’s Marriage Certification (SSA‑3) and supplemental statements—while the SSA may request additional verification or help the claimant obtain records [10] [2] [5].

6. Burden of proof and the POMS rules: when statements are enough and when they are not

SSA Program Operations Manual System (POMS) guidance explains that a spouse’s statement may be accepted as proof when corroborated by the worker, but that simple assertions will be rejected in certain situations and other evidence will be required; claimants must document why preferred proofs are unavailable and provide alternative corroboration per POMS and Handbook rules [4] [1].

7. What the reporting does not say: private and public pension administrators

The documents provided focus on SSA procedures and state common‑law recognition; they do not supply direct, detailed guidance from private or public pension administrators about how those plans verify informal marriages for survivor benefits, so a definitive description of pension‑plan practices cannot be drawn from these sources [2] [7].

8. Practical implications, contested cases and implicit incentives

Because the SSA relies on state law, documentary proof and discretionary evaluation, claimants in informal unions often confront evidentiary fights that can hinge on decades‑old records or witness affidavits; advocacy groups and attorneys frequently warn that delays, record gaps, or moves between states can disadvantage survivors, while the SSA’s insistence on original documents reflects both fraud prevention and administrative caution [8] [1].

9. Bottom line for a claimant seeking survivor benefits

The pathway is straightforward in principle—apply as a spouse and prove the marriage—but in practice the outcome depends on state common‑law rules, the available records (certificate or alternative documents), corroborating statements under POMS, and the applicant’s ability to marshal joint financial and personal evidence showing the couple presented themselves as married [5] [3] [1].

Want to dive deeper?
Which states currently recognize common‑law marriage and what proof do they require for legal recognition?
What specific kinds of documents (tax returns, insurance policies, declarations) have proven decisive in SSA common‑law marriage claims?
How do major private pension plans and public pensions (e.g., ERISA plans, state pensions) verify survivor relationships compared with the SSA?