Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What did Virginia Giuffre allege about the locations and dates she said incidents with Prince Andrew occurred?
Executive summary
Virginia Giuffre alleged she was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew on three occasions around 2001 when she was a teenager — including an encounter she says happened when she was 17 and a third she places on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island — and she described one encounter as occurring in Epstein’s New York townhouse roughly a month after the first [1] [2] [3]. These allegations appear across her memoir excerpts and prior legal filings; Prince Andrew has repeatedly denied the claims and the 2022 civil case was settled and dismissed without a trial [4] [5].
1. What Giuffre specifically says about timing and places
Giuffre’s public accounts — repeated in her memoir extracts, interviews and her 2021 lawsuit — state she was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell and forced to have sex with Prince Andrew three times in the early 2000s, with at least one encounter when she was 17 in 2001; she also alleges a second encounter in Epstein’s New York townhouse about a month later and a third encounter on Epstein’s private island [1] [2] [3].
2. The photograph and its suggested date
A widely circulated photograph of Giuffre with Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell is central to the timeline: Giuffre has said the photo was developed with a date stamp of March 13, 2001, and she recounts that the image was taken in that general period when she was 17 [1]. Media reporting and newly disclosed emails from Epstein have intensified scrutiny of that period and the photo’s provenance [6] [7].
3. How these claims entered the courts and the public record
Giuffre sued Prince Andrew in U.S. federal court in 2021, alleging sexual assault and trafficking in the early 2000s; the parties reached an out‑of‑court settlement in February 2022 and the case was dismissed without a trial, so some factual disputes were never litigated in open court [5]. Giuffre’s memoir and contemporaneous interviews later renewed public attention on the same timing and locations she had earlier alleged [3] [8].
4. Variations, limits and uncertainties in the accounts
Giuffre and reporting note that she could not always fix exact calendar dates for every encounter: she says, for example, she did not know “exactly when I had sex with Prince Andrew for the third time,” only that it occurred on Epstein’s island and involved others, which she described as an “orgy” [2]. Available sources do not provide a precise, consistently attributed calendar-day list for all three alleged encounters beyond the references to “around 2001,” the March‑2001 development date on the photo, and the New York townhouse description [1] [2].
5. Denials, settlement and competing narratives
Prince Andrew has repeatedly denied ever meeting Giuffre, denied the sexual-assault allegations and questioned the picture’s legitimacy; in public statements and interviews he has maintained his innocence even as the civil case was settled [4]. Epstein’s own released emails and other reporting have sometimes contradicted Andrew’s public denials — for instance by suggesting the photo was real — but questions about intent, context and legal liability remained unresolved by a trial because of the settlement [6] [7] [5].
6. Why the timing and locations matter to the story
The alleged timing (early 2000s, including 2001 when Giuffre was 17) is legally and politically significant because it intersects with trafficking allegations and with public scrutiny of Epstein’s network in that era; the asserted locations — London, Epstein’s New York townhouse and his private island — are repeatedly mentioned in Giuffre’s accounts and in media coverage as central sites in her narrative [3] [2] [8].
7. Broader reporting and ongoing investigations
After renewed disclosures (including emails from Epstein) and posthumous memoir extracts, British and U.S. outlets and some police bodies resumed scrutiny of elements of the story, such as whether officials or Andrew’s team tried to obtain information about Giuffre; these developments reinforce the focus on the early‑2000s timeline and the specific places she cited [9] [10] [11].
8. What the available sources do not settle
Available sources do not contain court-determined findings from a contested trial about the exact dates and each encounter’s circumstances, because the civil case settled and was dismissed; they also do not produce a full, independently verified chronology tying every alleged act to a specific calendar date beyond the photo’s development stamp and the memoir’s general recollections [5] [1] [2].
In sum: Giuffre consistently described three alleged encounters in the early 2000s — including when she was 17 in 2001, an incident in Epstein’s New York townhouse about a month after the first, and a third on Epstein’s private island — but precise calendar dates for every encounter are not uniformly asserted in the reporting and were not adjudicated at trial [1] [2] [3].