Virginia giuffre custody of kids and restraining order

1. What the reporting agrees on: a restraining order limited contact with her children

Multiple news outlets—People, CBS News and related coverage—report that Robert filed a family violence restraining order in February 2025 and that the result, according to family members, was that he obtained primary custody and Virginia was prohibited from contacting their three children ^{[1] [5] [2]}. Family members, including her brother Sky Roberts, told People the separation from her children caused her extreme anguish in the months before her death ^[1].

2. Dispute over whether Virginia breached the order

Reporting shows competing claims about compliance. Robert accused Virginia of breaching the family violence restraining order and a hearing was scheduled in magistrates’ court; People and Wikipedia note that allegation and the pending court appearance ^{[3] [6]}. Virginia and her representatives publicly denied violating the order and said she intended to defend herself against what they called a “malicious claim” ^[4].

3. Timeline and short-term conditions cited in reporting

Accounts place the restraining order in February 2025 and describe its effect lasting at least until June, per family statements quoted by People and other outlets saying she was prevented from contacting her children until that month ^{[1] [2]}. Some articles recount that the alleged breach and a subsequent court appearance occurred in March–April 2025 ^{[3] [4]}.

4. How family and friends framed the impact

Family members quoted in multiple pieces described the separation as devastating for Giuffre and linked her emotional state in part to being cut off from her children; her brother specifically called it “the worst pain in the world” ^{[1] [7]}. These are statements from relatives and should be read as their perspective rather than independent legal findings ^[1].

5. What the sources do not settle or do not mention

Available sources do not publish court orders or provide the full text of the restraining order, so they do not establish legal findings beyond journalistic summaries and family statements; they also do not include a formal judgment transcript or police reports that would independently corroborate each allegation (not found in current reporting). Sources do not report an outcome of any custody trial beyond the temporary restrictions described in February–June reporting (not found in current reporting).

6. Variations in language and tone across outlets

Some outlets emphasize the family perspective and emotional toll—People, Yahoo and Radar rely heavily on interviews with family members ^{[1] [8] [9]}. Other pieces note the legal back-and-forth: accusations that she breached the order and her denial through representatives ^{[3] [4]}. Readers should note that family testimony and a party’s denial are different kinds of evidence; the reportage mixes both.

7. Possible motives and framing to be aware of in coverage

Family members and Virginia’s representatives have incentives to frame events as abuse or malicious claims depending on allegiance; conversely, allegations by an estranged spouse and the decision to seek a restraining order may be driven by safety concerns or by strategic motives in custody disputes. The reporting documents both the filing and the denials but does not provide judicial findings that resolve competing narratives ^{[1] [4]}.

8. Bottom line for readers seeking clarity

Contemporary reporting consistently states a restraining order filed by Robert in February 2025 resulted in Robert having primary custody and limited Virginia’s contact with the children until at least June; it also documents competing claims about whether she breached that order and notes an upcoming court hearing ^{[1] [3] [2]}. For definitive legal status (full orders, hearing outcomes, or official court rulings) available sources do not publish the underlying court documents or final judgments in these summaries (not found in current reporting).