Did Virginia Giuffre leave a suicide note or written message indicating intent?

1. What supporters and family released — a rallying handwritten message, not a signed intent

Family members and spokespeople disclosed an older handwritten note by Virginia Giuffre that was found after her death; the shared text frames the message as a call to action for those who survived sexual abuse and stresses continued resistance—most prominently captured by the phrase “We are not going to go away.” This disclosure was reported in pieces that explicitly present the note as encouraging survivors to unite and press for justice, framing it as a message of purpose rather than a private document expressing imminent self-harm ^{[1] [2]}. A mainstream summary of these disclosures confirms the note’s survivor-centered content but does not present the document as a conventional farewell or a statement of suicidal intent ^[3].

2. Media portrayals differ — some headlines call it a note “left behind,” others contextualize it as advocacy

Some outlets used language such as “left behind” or “handwritten note” in headlines, which can imply finality or intent, while fuller reports and spokeswoman statements emphasize that the note’s content was advocacy-oriented and not a declared suicide note. The difference in headline framing versus article text suggests a divergence between sensationalized shorthand and the more cautious descriptions offered by family representatives and spokespeople who say the note was not presented as a final note of intent ^{[2] [3] [4]}. A number of reports also referenced the note’s age or that it was “older,” indicating it may not have been written immediately prior to her death—an important contextual detail that undercuts simple characterizations of it as a last testament ^{[1] [3]}.

3. Official characterizations and spokesperson comments push back against “suicide note” labeling

Giuffre’s spokeswoman and other reporting sources explicitly stated the note should not be treated as a suicide note or final expression of intent; rather, they described it as a meaningful message for survivors and families to persist in seeking justice ^[3]. This official framing is consistent across multiple analyses in the reporting set and signals a deliberate effort by those close to Giuffre to frame the public release as advocacy continuation rather than evidence of motive for her death. The consistent presence of this spokesman’s line across accounts introduces a verifiable claim by the family’s representatives that alters how the note should be interpreted in the public record ^{[3] [4]}.

4. Gaps in the record — what the reporting does not show or confirm

Available reports do not present the note as containing explicit language of imminent self-harm, explicit statements of intent to die, or contemporaneous dating that would tie it immediately to the events surrounding Giuffre’s death; key factual details such as when exactly the note was written, whether it was found next to her, or whether investigators considered it a suicide note are not provided in the cited coverage ^{[1] [5]}. Several sources supplied in the analysis set were judged not to contain relevant information about a suicide note at all, highlighting an evidence gap and undercutting any definitive claim that a written declaration of intent existed ^{[6] [7] [8]}.

5. Why different outlets reached different emphases — agendas, sourcing, and headline pressure

Tabloid-style outlets or brief news summaries sometimes used shorthand that can be read as suggesting a final note, while family releases and spokespeople emphasized survivor advocacy and the note’s older provenance; this pattern reflects typical media dynamics where attention-grabbing headlines can diverge from source statements embedded in the same stories ^{[2] [4]}. The family’s decision to release the note serves an advocacy purpose—to keep focus on survivors and pressure for accountability—and that motive likely shaped how the note was presented publicly. The combination of advocacy intent, varying editorial standards, and incomplete investigative detail explains the mixed public record on whether the note was a suicide note or a message to survivors ^{[1] [3] [4]}.

6. Bottom line: evidence supports a survivor-focused message, not a documented suicide note of intent

All verifiable reporting in the provided set supports that a handwritten note by Giuffre emphasizing continued fight for survivors exists and was released by her family; spokespeople and several reports explicitly state it was not a final suicide note indicating intent, and no sourced reporting in this set publishes language from a contemporaneous written declaration of intent to die ^{[1] [3] [4] [5]}. The factual record in these analyses therefore supports the conclusion that the document should be understood as a survivor-focused message rather than incontrovertible evidence of suicidal intent.