What did Virginia Giuffre or other accusers say about Donald Trump in their sworn statements (include dates)?

1. What Giuffre herself says — no sworn accusation, only encounters and context

Virginia Giuffre’s sworn testimony and memoir consistently describe meeting Donald Trump at Mar‑a‑Lago and encountering him socially, but she does not allege that Trump sexually abused her. In a 2016 deposition produced in litigation, Giuffre stated she did not see Trump engage in sexual activity with her or other girls and denied that he flirted with her ^[1]. Her posthumous memoir and contemporaneous accounts recount a meeting and brief interactions at Mar‑a‑Lago in 2000, including babysitting offers and seeing Trump at social events, but do not assert criminal conduct by Trump ^{[2] [3]}. These statements form the core of Giuffre’s direct, sworn record concerning Trump rather than unambiguous accusations.

2. Documents and logs: named, not proven — passenger logs and unreleased files

Jeffrey Epstein’s records and associated investigative files include Trump’s name in passenger logs and other documents, which has led to media attention but does not equate to a sworn allegation of wrongdoing. Reporting and document reviews note Trump appears in Epstein’s logs seven times and his name appears in some unreleased or redacted files tied to the Epstein inquiry ^{[3] [4]}. Legal and reporting contexts emphasize that being named in records or logs is distinct from being accused; experts and journalists repeatedly caution that mentions in documents require corroboration before implying culpability ^{[5] [4]}. The records provide context about social ties and timing but are not equivalent to sworn claims against Trump.

3. Other accusers’ statements and retractions — a mixed record

Other individuals linked to Epstein’s circle have offered statements that mention Trump in different ways, and their accounts are inconsistent. Maria Farmer reported urging the FBI decades ago to investigate Trump based on an encounter she described, a claim the White House has contested and which lacks publicly released documentary proof ^[6]. Sarah Ransome at one point claimed Trump had sexual relations with Epstein’s girls but later retracted that claim, illustrating how witness statements can change and complicate the record ^[5]. These dynamics reveal that accusations about Trump from Epstein-related accusers are not uniform and include assertions, recantations, and contested memories.

4. Public memoirs and interviews: descriptive mention but no sworn charge

Giuffre’s memoir and interviews center on her exploitation by Epstein and Maxwell and list meetings with numerous powerful figures, including Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, but do not level a sworn criminal charge against Trump. The memoir describes Trump as a background figure during her early employment at Mar‑a‑Lago and recounts social encounters and the social environment in which she met Maxwell ^{[7] [2]}. Journalistic summaries of the memoir note that it supplies important context about networks and timing around Epstein, yet the memoir stops short of identifying Trump as a perpetrator in Giuffre’s documented narrative ^[3].

5. Legal context: depositions, missing pages, and limits on inference

Giuffre’s 2016 deposition, produced in litigation against Ghislaine Maxwell, contains passages asserting she did not observe Trump committing sexual abuse; however, some pages in the deposition are missing and redactions complicate interpretation ^[1]. Legal analysts warn that absences, redactions, and the differing purposes of depositions versus criminal indictments limit how much one can infer from the available record ^{[1] [4]}. Courts and journalists emphasize that sworn statements in civil litigation differ in scope and standard from criminal charges; the public file establishes encounters and denials but does not provide a prosecutorial finding implicating Trump.

6. Big picture — names, memories, and the necessity of corroboration

Across sources, the consistent facts are: Epstein and Trump were socially acquainted in the 1990s and early 2000s; Thomas Giuffre worked at Mar‑a‑Lago and his daughter met Maxwell there; Giuffre met Trump and described him as friendly but did not accuse him of sexual misconduct in her sworn statements ^{[8] [2] [1]}. Other accusers’ claims vary, some have retracted statements, and some allege encounters worth investigating, but public records and reporting to date reveal mentions and context rather than prosecutable proof ^{[6] [5]}. The evidentiary standard requires corroboration beyond naming and recollection before converting social mentions into criminal findings.