Were any toxicology results released in Virginia Giuffre's death investigation?

1. What the immediate reporting says: death ruled suicide, tests anticipated

Early mainstream outlets reported Giuffre’s death as suicide and described the scene and family statement without publishing completed forensic reports; CBS News reported the family’s statement that she “died by suicide” at her Western Australia farm on April 25, 2025 ^[1]. People’s reporting notes Giuffre’s Australia‑based attorney later clarified remarks that had been interpreted as expressing doubt about suicide, underscoring that media accounts initially leaned on family and lawyer statements rather than released autopsy documents ^[2].

2. Where toxicology enters the public narrative: pending tests and speculation

Some outlets and aggregation pieces flagged that toxicology tests were expected and still pending; a lifestyle/sports blog item cited an understanding that she “suffered a pills overdose” and said toxicology tests were “still pending,” but that account is not tied to an official coroner’s release in the materials you provided ^[3]. Other mainstream reports repeated family and lawyer concerns and the expectation that formal coroner findings could take time, but those same mainstream pieces in the set do not report published toxicology results ^{[1] [4]}.

3. What the provided sources do not contain: no released toxicology report

In the set of articles you supplied, I found no coroner’s office statement, medical examiner’s report, or published toxicology findings concluding cause or listing substances found; available sources do not mention an official toxicology result being released ^{[1] [2] [3]}. When an autopsy or toxicology report is completed and released, reputable outlets typically cite the coroner’s office or include the report; those citations are absent from the current reporting ^{[1] [2]}.

4. Family and lawyer responses: questioning, seeking answers

Giuffre’s family and some of her lawyers publicly questioned circumstances around her death and urged investigation; People reported her attorney sought to clarify earlier comments that some had taken as expressing doubt about suicide, and other pieces noted family concerns and calls for further inquiry ^{[2] [4]}. Those statements are part of the public record in these pieces, but they do not substitute for—nor confirm—the release of toxicology data ^{[2] [4]}.

5. Why toxicology results matter and typical timelines

Journalistic accounts in this file repeatedly note that coronial processes can take months to years in complex cases and that toxicology testing is a routine part of such investigations; one piece even said a formal coroner’s report could take up to two years, reflecting how delayed public release of toxicology findings can be ^[3]. The sources make clear that pending toxicology does not equal concealment, but neither do the supplied reports show a later public release ^[3].

6. Caveats, remaining unknowns and how to verify

Given the absence of a coroner’s release among supplied sources, the responsible conclusion is that no toxicology results are reported here; to verify whether results have since been released, check the Western Australia coroner’s office statements, official autopsy/coroner records, or subsequent coverage by major outlets that would cite those documents—none of which appear in your provided set ^{[1] [2]}. If you want, I can search for later official releases or coroner statements beyond these sources.

Summary: reporting in your documents records Giuffre’s death as suicide and notes expectations of toxicology testing, but the provided sources do not publish or cite completed toxicology results or an official coroner’s toxicology report ^{[1] [2] [3]}.