Which royal figures has Virginia Giuffre publicly accused by name and in what contexts?

1. The central accusation: Prince Andrew named and detailed

Virginia Giuffre’s most explicit and sustained public accusation by name is against Prince Andrew (also referred to in some outlets as the Duke of York or Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor). In her posthumous memoir and in extracts published by major outlets she alleges being trafficked to and having sexual encounters with him on three occasions, including at Ghislaine Maxwell’s London house, and recounts an infamous photograph that became central to the dispute ^{[1] [5] [2]}.

2. Context of the claim: trafficking, settlement and denials

Giuffre frames her allegation to Andrew within a broader account that she was recruited and trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Reporting notes she pursued civil legal action that resulted in a financial settlement with Andrew in 2022; Andrew has consistently denied wrongdoing and has publicly said he “vigorously deny[s] the accusations” ^{[6] [1] [7]}. Press coverage emphasises that the allegations sit alongside long-running scrutiny of Epstein’s network ^{[8] [6]}.

3. Public and official fallout connected to the allegations

Media reporting links Giuffre’s claims to significant repercussions for Andrew: renewed scrutiny, police interest in certain conduct around the emergence of the photographic evidence, and, ultimately, Andrew relinquishing royal titles amid the scandal as reported across outlets ^{[9] [10] [7]}. Sources show the family and others have noted the settlement and its political/royal ramifications, though Andrew continues to deny the allegations ^{[11] [4]}.

4. Other royal figures — what Giuffre did and did not name

Available reporting and the memoir extracts focus on Prince Andrew as the named royal figure Giuffre accused; they do not report Giuffre publicly naming other members of the royal family as perpetrators. Some pieces mention speculation or discussion about the royal household in relation to settlement funding or witness possibilities (for example possible involvement of Sarah Ferguson or princesses as witnesses in litigation discussions), but those are not presented as Giuffre’s direct accusations of sexual misconduct against other royals ^{[3] [7] [11]}. Therefore, current sources do not mention Giuffre naming other royals as abusers.

5. Claims about hush terms, funding and palace links — contested terrain

Giuffre’s memoir and reporting around it raise questions about a settlement, alleged gag terms timed around royal events, and speculation that royal funds (or the late Queen’s Duchy of Lancaster income) may have been involved in payment — claims that have generated political and media calls for clarification ^{[11] [3]}. These topics remain contested in reporting: outlets relay Giuffre’s account and family statements, while palace spokespeople and Andrew have issued denials or limited commentary; the sources show active debate rather than settled fact ^{[11] [7]}.

6. Police and institutional scrutiny referenced in sources

Several outlets report that police or investigators have taken an interest in related matters — for example, the Metropolitan Police are said to be looking into claims that Andrew asked a close-protection officer to obtain information about Giuffre around the time a controversial photo emerged ^[9]. Reporting frames this as part of a wider inquiry into the Epstein network and attendant actions by people around the prince, rather than an admission of guilt by Andrew ^{[9] [5]}.

7. Limitations, competing accounts and what’s not in the record

Sources consistently note Andrew’s denials of Giuffre’s allegations; Giuffre’s family and supporters characterise her as instrumental to accountability efforts ^{[8] [10]}. Available sources do not provide evidence that Giuffre publicly named other specific royals as abusers; they do report her discussing settlement terms, alleged harassment by “internet trolls,” and the wider network surrounding Epstein and Maxwell ^{[3] [4]}. Where speculation exists (for example about funding sources), reporting presents it as unresolved and calls for transparency rather than as established fact ^[11].

If you want, I can extract the exact phrasing Giuffre used in the memoir excerpts about Prince Andrew, or compile a timeline of reporting steps (lawsuits, settlement, memoir publication, and palace responses) using the same set of sources.