Did Virginia Roberts Giuffre have ongoing legal actions or settlements at the time of her death?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Virginia Roberts Giuffre died in April 2025 while several civil and family-law matters connected to her were unresolved: Australian courts later found she died without a valid will and an administrator was appointed so frozen civil actions — including a high‑profile 2021 defamation suit and disputes over control of settlement money and literary rights — can now proceed [1] [2]. Her estate’s value was reported in court as about A$472,000 for intestacy‑threshold purposes even as family members allege millions from prior settlements may be missing or held in trusts [3] [4].
1. Court freeze and what “ongoing legal action” meant after her death
After Giuffre died, her death produced legal effects: pending civil cases and arbitrations in which she was a party were paused and required a legal personal representative to be appointed before they could continue; Western Australian court orders explicitly noted the administrator could act for proceedings that existed before her death [1] [2]. Newsweek and The Guardian both report that this appointment unblocks previously frozen matters — most notably a New York defamation action filed by Rina Oh and other disputes tied to her public allegations [2] [1].
2. Defamation and counterclaims that were active or could restart
Court documents cited in reporting list multiple “existing and other legal proceedings,” including a 2021 defamation suit by Rina Oh that had been stalled by Giuffre’s death and a December 2022 counterclaim Giuffre filed accusing Oh of abusive conduct within Epstein’s circle [1] [2]. Newsweek reports the administrator’s appointment allows Oh’s legal team to formally serve Giuffre’s estate and resume the New York proceedings [2].
3. Estate administration, wealthy settlements and the “missing millions” dispute
Giuffre’s family has publicly questioned how much of the multimillion‑dollar settlements she previously obtained remains available. Court filings and press coverage indicate much of the money from settlements — including the reported 2022 settlement with Prince Andrew — may have been placed in trusts such as the Witty River Family Trust, and family members say the estate now appears far smaller than expected, prompting litigation over who controls remaining assets [4] [3]. The Guardian notes the estate likely includes what’s left of a reported £12m settlement with Andrew, while family submissions in Perth show competing claims over administration and valuation [1] [4].
4. Family, estranged spouse and custody/divorce litigation at time of death
At the time of her death Giuffre was undergoing a separation and divorce and an active custody dispute over her three children; her husband Robert had filed for divorce months earlier and had obtained a restraining order that limited her contact with the children — matters that were the subject of upcoming court dates and appear in several reports [5] [6] [7]. Australian reporting highlights that relatives are contesting whether Robert should receive estate funds and whether an informal written note she made in February constituted a valid will [3] [4].
5. What reporters and court documents do not say (important limits)
Available sources do not provide a full forensic accounting of where every dollar from earlier settlements went; they report competing claims that some funds are held in trusts or escrow and that the publicly listed estate value in Western Australia used for intestacy thresholds was A$472,000 [3] [2]. Reports describe family concern that “millions” are missing but do not document complete asset ledgers, transfers or court conclusions proving misappropriation [4] [8].
6. Competing narratives and potential agendas to note
Coverage shows competing interests: Giuffre’s sons and her father seek control of the estate and literary rights; her former housekeeper and attorney have filed to be administrators; her estranged husband wants marital rights to assets; and plaintiffs such as Rina Oh seek to restart defamation litigation against Giuffre’s estate [2] [9] [1]. Some outlets emphasize family suspicion of missing money, which can drive sensational headlines, while court documents focus on legal mechanics of intestacy and administrator appointment — two different framing priorities in the public record [4] [2].
7. Bottom line for your question
Yes: at the time of her death Giuffre had active civil and family‑law matters — including impending restraining‑order/custody and divorce proceedings and civil claims such as the Rina Oh defamation dispute and related counterclaims — and the death created procedural freezes that required a court‑appointed administrator to reopen them; separate litigation over who controls and values her estate (and any proceeds from past settlements or a posthumous memoir) followed her intestacy ruling [6] [1] [2].