Was the man arrested in st paul a citizen with no criminal record

Checked on January 19, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Local reporting and advocacy materials indicate the man detained at a St. Paul gas station is not a U.S. citizen but rather a Honduran national who had a final order of removal in 2020, and supporters say he has no criminal history; Minnesota court searches turned up no records under his name, though official criminal-history systems and jail rosters remain the authoritative sources for verification [1] [2] [3].

1. What the reporting actually reports

The Pioneer Press account summarizes competing claims: Homeland Security/Border Patrol materials referenced the arrest and say the person had a final order of removal from 2020, while a GoFundMe set up for the family and local advocates assert he “doesn’t have a criminal history,” and searches of Minnesota court records did not return matching records under his name [1].

2. Citizenship: the public record vs. activist claims

Public reporting cites federal immigration records in which Homeland Security identified the detainee as a Honduran national issued a final order of removal — a clear indication he was not being described by authorities as a U.S. citizen — and that characterization is what local coverage relays [1]; the activist narrative emphasizing a lack of citizenship status aims to highlight immigration-enforcement impacts and bolster calls for legal help.

3. Criminal-history evidence and its limits

Advocates and the GoFundMe state he has no criminal record, and Pioneer Press reporters noted that a search of Minnesota court records “did not turn up any records with his name,” which supports the “no local criminal record” assertion as far as accessible state court databases go [1] [2]; however, absence from a name search in one database is not definitive proof of no record elsewhere, and the Minnesota Public Criminal History (BCA CHS) is the recommended channel for comprehensive public criminal-history searches [2] [3].

4. Where to look for authoritative confirmation

Official confirmation requires checking the relevant repositories: Minnesota’s online court case search and the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension’s Minnesota Public Criminal History Search are the state tools recommended for background checks, while county jail rosters and warrants lists provide immediate booking information when arrests are processed locally [2] [3] [4]. Local jail and court databases update on different schedules and may omit pending matters or records outside Minnesota jurisdiction [2] [5].

5. Why public narratives diverge and what agendas might be at play

Two narratives are colliding: the federal enforcement account frames the incident as an immigration arrest tied to a removal order, whereas community groups emphasize the detainee’s lack of criminal history to argue the arrest was unjust; media outlets can amplify one frame or the other depending on source access and advocacy pressure, and a GoFundMe or activist statements naturally aim to mobilize legal aid and public sympathy [1]. Official sources (federal arrest/immigration records) have enforcement motives; advocacy sources have a protection and resource-mobilization motive.

6. Bottom line — direct answer

Based on the reporting compiled: the man detained at the St. Paul gas station is publicly identified by federal authorities as a Honduran national with a final order of removal (i.e., not a U.S. citizen), and local reporting and a GoFundMe state he has no known criminal history while Minnesota court online searches returned no records under his name; authoritative clearance or rebuttal would require queries of the Minnesota BCA CHS and the specific federal immigration and arrest records, which are the primary sources for definitive confirmation [1] [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
How can the Minnesota BCA Public Criminal History Search be used to verify an individual's criminal record?
What public federal immigration records are available to confirm removal orders and detainee nationality?
How have local media and advocacy groups reported on similar immigration arrests in St. Paul and what discrepancies emerged?