What specific lien or levy documents did the Westchester County Clerk record after March 6, 2024, in the Trump judgment file?

1. The core filing: judgment registered March 6, 2024

Multiple outlets reported that Letitia James’ office “registered” the court judgment in Westchester County on March 6 — a ministerial recording that makes the judgment enforceable against property in that county and is the action news coverage pointed to when discussing potential seizures ^{[1] [2] [7] [8] [9]}. Westchester County Clerk Tim Idoni described that filing as effectively placing a lien on Trump properties in the county, language repeated by local reporting ^[3].

2. What “registered” means in public-records practice

The Westchester County Clerk’s office publishes that judgments and liens recorded in the office become permanent public records, and that entries include the original judgment and any subsequent filings such as satisfactions, renewals, or other lien-related documents — all searchable via Westchester Records Online or by request from the clerk ^{[4] [5] [6]}. That procedural detail explains why reporters equated the March 6 registration with a county lien being placed: registration is the mechanism by which a judgment becomes part of the local lien index ^[3].

3. No reporting in the supplied corpus describing post‑March 6 lien or levy entries

The articles and clerk pages in the provided reporting uniformly focus on the March 6 registration and the possibility of future seizures if Trump failed to post an appeal bond; none of the pieces cite a subsequent recorded levy, execution, writ, or other specific lien-recording event in the Westchester file after March 6 ^{[1] [2] [10] [7]}. Reuters, Bloomberg and regional outlets note registration and the potential to seize properties but do not list later filings such as levy notices, sheriff’s executions, or asset-specific liens recorded after that date ^{[10] [2]}.

4. How reporting frames the leap from registration to seizure — and why that matters

Coverage repeatedly framed the March 6 registration as a precursor to asset seizure if a bond wasn’t posted, an accurate description of a possible enforcement path, but one that can blur the difference between recording a judgment (a clerical act) and taking affirmative levy steps like seizing property or filing specific writs of execution — actions that would themselves generate separate recorded documents in the clerk’s land or judgment indices ^{[1] [2] [3]}. That conflation benefits dramatic headlines about imminent seizures but, in the sources provided, is not supported by citations of actual post‑March 6 levy instruments being recorded ^{[3] [1]}.

5. Where to find the definitive answer and limits of the current reporting

Westchester’s clerk office instructions make clear that anyone seeking the exact list of documents recorded in a given judgment file should search Westchester Records Online or request certified copies or index reports from the clerk; the supplied reporting does not reproduce those clerk index entries beyond noting the March 6 registration ^{[4] [6]}. Therefore, on the evidence submitted here, it is not possible to enumerate any specific lien or levy documents recorded after March 6, 2024 — the public record trail for any subsequent filings would need to be checked directly in the county clerk’s index or through an official records request ^{[4] [6]}.

6. Bottom line: registration occurred; no subsequent recorded levy documents identified in these sources

The files available in the provided reporting confirm the March 6 registration of the judgment in Westchester (creating a county-record lien on paper) and describe the state’s readiness to pursue seizures if bond conditions weren’t met, but they do not identify any discrete lien, levy, writ, or execution documents recorded in the Trump judgment file after March 6; verifying such post‑March‑6 entries requires a direct search of the Westchester County Clerk’s judgment-and-liens index or certified records ^{[1] [2] [10] [4] [6]}.