Has the Western Australia coroner since published a final report on Virginia Giuffre’s death?

1. What the public record says now

Contemporary coverage from The Guardian repeatedly states that Western Australia police have prepared a report for the coroner and that the Coroner’s Court could not offer a timetable for concluding investigations into Giuffre’s death, language that indicates an open coronial process rather than a completed inquiry ^{[1] [2]}. The Coroner’s Court of Western Australia’s own site explains that coronial inquest findings are made available when handed down and are searchable or available by request, implying that a published final finding would appear on or after delivery — but no such finding related to this death is present in the cited inquest findings page or site information accessed in the reporting ^{[3] [4]}.

2. How officials have characterised the investigation

Police publicly described the death as not being treated as suspicious while major crime detectives prepared material for the coroner, language reported by The Guardian and reflected in contemporaneous coverage, which is consistent with a standard coronial referral rather than the release of a conclusive coronial finding ^{[1] [2]}. Independent secondary summaries, such as a Wikipedia entry compiled from media reporting, also note that “an investigation is ongoing” and that early indications were that the death was not suspicious, reinforcing the picture of an unresolved coronial process in the public record rather than a closed case with a published finding ^[5].

3. Why there is no published final report yet (based on sources)

Coronial inquiries can take time; the Coroner’s Court website explains that written findings are formal documents handed down after investigations and will be posted once delivered or available by request, and the court in this instance explicitly could not give a timeframe for completion — statements that, taken together with police preparing a report, explain why no published final finding is currently available in the public coronial lists ^{[3] [4] [1]}. Reporting also notes ongoing parallel legal and estate disputes that surround Giuffre’s death and may intersect with coronial processes, but the court’s absence of a timetable remains the operative fact in the public reporting ^{[1] [2]}.

4. Alternative viewpoints, limitations and potential agendas

Some family statements and advocacy narratives have expressed suspicion or called for fuller transparency, which have driven public attention and media coverage, but the coroner’s office — the statutory body charged with making determinations — remains the only source that can issue a final, authoritative finding; the available sources show no such issuance to date ^{[1] [3]}. Reporting limitations are clear: these sources do not provide a direct, up-to-the-minute search of the Coroner’s Court database at this moment, so while the assembled reporting consistently says no final finding has been published and that the court could not provide a timeframe, absolute confirmation would require direct verification of the court’s published findings after the date of those articles ^{[3] [1]}.

5. Bottom line and how to verify going forward

The balance of the available authoritative reporting and the court’s published procedures indicates that no final coronial report on Virginia Giuffre’s death had been published as of the cited coverage, and the Coroner’s Court advised only that investigations were ongoing with no timetable for a finding ^{[1] [3]}. To confirm whether a finding has since been delivered, the appropriate next step is to check the Coroner’s Court of Western Australia’s official inquest findings page or contact the Office of the State Coroner directly, because coronial findings are formally published there when delivered ^{[3] [4]}.