Where is the investigation report from fbi on tom human?
Executive summary
The publicly reported FBI-related material about Tom Homan centers on an FBI bribery sting in which Homan allegedly accepted $50,000 from undercover agents; major outlets say the Justice Department later closed the probe without charges and FBI/DOJ officials stated they found “no credible evidence of any criminal wrongdoing” (reported by Reuters and others) [1]. Democratic lawmakers have pressed for documents and a recorded tape; reporting shows conflicting accounts about why the investigation ended and who reviewed the evidence [2] [3].
1. The allegation that sparked the search for an FBI report
Reporting in September 2025 first surfaced that Tom Homan, President Trump’s “border czar,” was recorded accepting a $50,000 cash payment from undercover FBI agents as part of an influence‑peddling/bribery sting; outlets including The Guardian and Reuters described the cash handoff and the underlying allegation that Homan indicated he would facilitate government contracts in return [3] [1]. Forbes and MSNBC reporting summarized similar facts about a suspected pay‑to‑play scheme and a bag of cash delivered during a meeting in Texas [4].
2. What the FBI/DOJ publicly said about the probe
FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a statement saying the matter “originated under the previous administration” and that agents and prosecutors “found no credible evidence of any criminal wrongdoing,” explaining the Department’s resources should focus on “real threats” [1]. Multiple accounts report the investigation was closed and no charges were filed [1] [4].
3. Conflicting accounts and the political context
News organizations and congressional Democrats note conflicting descriptions of why the probe ended: some sources told Reuters and Forbes that the investigation closed because prosecutors doubted they could prove bribery to a jury, while others say the case was shut prematurely after the presidential transition and suggest political interference by Trump appointees [1] [4]. Democrats on Capitol Hill have opened oversight inquiries and asked DOJ/FBI to turn over a reported tape and records related to the case [2].
4. What reporters say exists — and what’s missing in public records
Multiple outlets report a recorded tape allegedly shows Homan taking the cash; House Democrats are seeking that tape and other materials from the FBI and DOJ [2] [3]. Available reporting does not provide a public, declassified FBI “investigation report” document in the sense of a single FBI‑authored public report; rather, current public sources describe internal investigatory steps, a recorded encounter, and DOJ/FBI statements about the outcome [3] [1] [4]. Available sources do not mention a publicly released, standalone FBI investigative report on Homan beyond press accounts and the DOJ/FBI statements described above [3] [1] [4].
5. Oversight and the demand for release of materials
House Democrats have launched probes and are pressing DOJ to produce the tape and internal files; they argue understanding who reviewed the evidence and why the case closed is central to determining whether standard prosecutorial and investigative practices were followed [2]. Republicans have shown little appetite for similar oversight, which shapes how aggressively congressional inquiries may proceed [2].
6. How to locate official records if you want them
Public, official FBI press releases and DOJ/IG reports are published on agency websites; the FBI maintains press releases and news items but the sources provided here do not show a dedicated public “investigation report” posted by the FBI on Homan [5] [6]. Congressional oversight requests and committee records — or the DOJ’s internal memos and any Inspector General reviews — would be the most likely paths to obtain underlying files, but current reporting only documents that Democrats have asked for those materials [2].
7. Competing narratives and what readers should watch next
Mainstream reporting (Reuters, Forbes, The Guardian) agrees on the core factual frame — an undercover sting, a $50,000 cash handoff, and a later closure of the probe — but diverges on motive and timing for closing the case: one strand cites prosecutorial doubts about proof; another points to potential political influence after the Trump transition [1] [4] [3]. The next reliable developments to watch are: whether DOJ or the FBI declassify or release the tape and files, whether the Justice Department Inspector General opens an independent review, and whether congressional subpoenas force disclosure [2] [1].
Limitations: reporting relied on news accounts and public statements; available sources do not include a public, formal FBI investigation report document authored and published by the FBI on Tom Homan [3] [1] [4].