Which websites host the unsealed Epstein court records and how do I search them?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Three types of places now host the court records that were unsealed in connection with Jeffrey Epstein: official court systems and government releases (PACER and, in later actions, DOJ/legislative releases), nonprofit/document-hosting platforms that mirror and index filings (DocumentCloud and mirrors used by some newsrooms), and news organizations that publish the documents or downloadable compilations (The Guardian, Axios, New York Times and outlets that curated ZIPs) [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. To find and search these records efficiently, start with PACER for authoritative dockets, use DocumentCloud for full-text search of mirrored PDFs, and consult major media repositories and curated ZIPs for fast downloads and context while being mindful of redactions and ongoing declassification efforts [1] [2] [6] [7].
1. Where the official copies originate: PACER and the federal docket system
The primary source of record for federal court filings remains PACER — the judiciary’s public access portal where the filings were first available and where heavy user fees and occasional outages pushed reporters to mirror material elsewhere (404 Media noted paying PACER fees and downloading before a crash) [1]. Journalistic accounts and court reporting repeatedly cite the Manhattan federal court docket as the origin of the sealed-and-then-unsealed entries that Judge Loretta Preska ordered released in late 2023 and early 2024 [4] [8].
2. DocumentCloud and public-document hosts that keep searchable mirrors
DocumentCloud hosts large, fully text-searchable sets of the unsealed Epstein documents — including an entry listed as 2,024 files and a separate 943-page compilation — letting researchers search names and phrases across the PDFs without PACER’s access friction [2] [6]. Because DocumentCloud extracts OCR text, it is especially useful to locate appearances of names, dates, and quoted testimony within the unsealed packets [2] [6].
3. Major news organizations that published the files or full-text readers
Several news organizations published the unsealed files or provided “read here” pages that embed or link to full documents: The Guardian offered direct access and assembled the papers for public reading (noting nearly 950 pages in one batch) [3], while The New York Times and CNN published detailed reporting alongside embedded documents or links to the materials to give context [4] [9]. Axios and ABC, CBS and CNBC summarized the contents and linked to unsealed depositions and lists of names when available [5] [10] [8] [11] [12].
4. Mirrored ZIPs and independent outlets that redistributed the files
Independent outlets such as 404 Media compiled and offered ZIP downloads of the newly unsealed files, explicitly saying they downloaded material before PACER instability and made the files freely available as a public service [1]. These mirrors are expedient for bulk downloads but require caution: mirrors may combine batches, omit court metadata, or preserve redactions inconsistently, so cross-checks with PACER or DocumentCloud are recommended [1].
5. Government declassification and later releases — DOJ and congressional uploads
Beyond civil filings, subsequent government actions expanded the publicly available material: the Department of Justice and FBI produced declassified files and the House committee released tens of thousands of pages related to Epstein and Maxwell in later stages, meaning additional records can be found on official government sites when declassification or congressional disclosure occurs [7] [13]. These government-hosted files are authoritative but may differ in scope from the civil-litigation packets unsealed earlier [7] [13].
6. Practical search strategy and caveats for researchers
For authoritative retrieval, search the PACER docket for the Giuffre v. Maxwell case and related civil dockets, then use DocumentCloud to perform full-text searches across mirrored PDFs for names, dates, and phrases [1] [2] [6]. Supplement with newsroom pages (The Guardian, NYT, CNN) for clickable readers and context; use mirrored ZIPs for offline review but verify provenance against PACER or DocumentCloud because mirrors can be partial and media summaries may emphasize certain names without establishing wrongdoing [3] [4] [1]. Finally, track DOJ and congressional releases for separate law-enforcement or investigative records that fall outside the civil filings [7] [13].