Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which banks, law firms, or intermediaries facilitated Epstein’s offshore structures?
Executive summary
Available reporting ties Jeffrey Epstein’s offshore structures to a handful of law firms, banks and intermediaries: Bermuda law firm Appleby (which created offshore entities for Epstein), the offshore vehicle Liquid Funding Ltd. (linked to Bear Stearns and later involving JPMorgan functions), and large banks including JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank that maintained accounts and relationships facilitating transfers and trust structures [1] [2] [3]. Court settlements and regulatory actions — notably Deutsche Bank’s $150M penalty and a later $75M civil settlement — underscore official findings that banks failed to flag suspicious activity connected to his offshore arrangements [3] [4].
1. Appleby — the offshore law firm that appears in the Paradise Papers
Documents leaked from Appleby show Epstein became a client in the late 1990s and that Appleby helped create and administer offshore companies and investment vehicles that obscured ownership and flows, placing it centrally among the intermediaries used to set up his Bermuda and other offshore entities [1] [2]. Reporting by the Miami Herald and the ICIJ traced Epstein’s use of Appleby to register vehicles such as Liquid Funding Ltd. and to manage the paperwork common to tax-haven structures [5] [1].
2. Liquid Funding Ltd., Bear Stearns and the island links
The Paradise Papers and related reporting identify Liquid Funding Ltd., a Bermuda-registered company Epstein chaired from about 2000 to 2007; Bear Stearns (where Epstein once worked) is reported as a partial owner and as Liquid Funding’s investment manager in Dublin, linking traditional Wall Street firms to an offshore vehicle Epstein controlled [1]. The structure illustrates the mix of onshore investment managers and offshore registration Epstein used to hold complex securities and to take advantage of low-tax jurisdictions [1].
3. JPMorgan Chase — long-time bank, contested role
JPMorgan served as one of Epstein’s primary banks for years; lawsuits and unsealed documents detail over $1 billion in transactions tied to him and related entities, and the bank is described by some reporting as a “cash conduit” for accounts and transactions connected to his offshore trust structures, including functions tied to Liquid Funding and the Butterfly Trust [6] [7] [3]. JPMorgan has faced civil litigation and scrutiny but reporting also shows the bank maintained that most employees were unaware of wrongdoing beyond known individuals like Jes Staley [6].
4. Deutsche Bank — regulatory penalties and civil settlement
New York regulators faulted Deutsche Bank for failures in handling Epstein’s business; the bank was fined $150 million in 2020 for shoddy oversight and later agreed to a $75 million settlement with victims, with prosecutors and plaintiffs pointing to its role in moving settlement payments, legal-fee payments and other transactions tied to Epstein and related offshore instruments such as the Butterfly Trust [3] [4]. The bank acknowledged onboarding errors and compliance weaknesses in its public statements cited in reporting [8] [3].
5. Law firms, auditors and trustees named in reporting
Beyond Appleby, reporting and document dumps name corporate law firms, auditors and trustees linked to specific vehicles: for example, Sidley Austin is reported in coverage as legal counsel for Liquid Funding, and Deloitte appears in documents as Liquid Funding’s auditor; JPMorgan was identified as a security trustee in some corporate filings — demonstrating a web of conventional professional intermediaries tied to the offshore entities Epstein chaired [7] [1]. These roles are typical of how offshore vehicles are given legitimacy and operational access to onshore markets [7] [1].
6. What the sources disagree on or do not say
Available sources document who provided services (Appleby, Bear Stearns/Liquid Funding connections, JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, various law firms/auditors) but do not uniformly assert criminal liability for every named institution; some sources report regulatory penalties and civil settlements (Deutsche Bank) while other institutions (JPMorgan, Sidley Austin, auditors) appear in transactional records or reporting and face litigation and scrutiny rather than definitive criminal findings in the provided documents [3] [7] [1]. Available sources do not mention definitive criminal charges against most banks solely for creating offshore entities; rather, they describe failures of compliance, civil lawsuits, and settlements [3] [4].
7. Takeaway and limits of the public record
Public reporting — including Paradise Papers analysis and press investigations — paints a consistent picture that Epstein used a mix of offshore law firms (Appleby), registered offshore vehicles (Liquid Funding), onshore investment managers and trustees (Bear Stearns, JPMorgan roles), and large banks (Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan) to hide assets and move money [1] [6] [3]. However, the sources show varying levels of culpability: regulators fined Deutsche Bank and victims settled with it, while for other institutions the reporting documents connections, transactions and lawsuits without uniform regulatory conclusions [3] [4] [7]. Available sources do not provide an exhaustive list of every intermediary Epstein used, only those revealed in leaks, lawsuits and regulatory findings cited above [1] [5].
If you want, I can extract the specific entity names and the document citations (e.g., Appleby files, Liquid Funding corporate filings, JPMorgan transaction summaries) into a timeline or table drawn strictly from these sources.