What specific court orders sealed Jeffrey Epstein’s grand jury materials and when were those orders entered?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Federal grand‑jury materials in the Jeffrey Epstein investigations were subject to longstanding statutory secrecy and judge‑entered orders that kept transcripts and exhibits under seal until recent rulings this month overturned or modified those seals; key judicial entries included a Manhattan order in August 2025 denying a Justice Department bid to unseal Epstein’s 2019 grand‑jury records (later reversed), a Florida order that had kept earlier 2005–07 grand jury transcripts sealed until December 2025, and multiple New York orders in early–mid December 2025 authorizing limited unsealing under the new Epstein Files Transparency Act [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Why the records were sealed: statutory grand‑jury secrecy and prior judicial protection
Grand‑jury materials are ordinarily sealed under federal law and court practice, and judges repeatedly invoked those secrecy norms and victim‑privacy concerns in earlier rulings that kept Epstein‑related grand‑jury documents from public view [1] [2].
2. The Manhattan entry that kept the 2019 materials sealed (August 2025 denial)
U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman, who presided over the 2019 federal prosecution in Manhattan, denied an earlier Justice Department application in August 2025 to unseal the 2019 grand‑jury records — a denial grounded in concerns about victims’ safety and privacy and the general rule that grand‑jury transcripts remain sealed absent an override [1] [5].
3. The Florida 2005–2007 grand‑jury materials: sealed for years, then reopened under the new law
Grand‑jury transcripts from the earlier Florida investigations of Epstein dating to 2005 and 2007 had likewise been maintained under judicial seal for years, and it was only after Congress enacted the Epstein Files Transparency Act and the Justice Department sought relief that U.S. District Judge Rodney Smith in Florida granted the government’s motion to unseal those mid‑2000s grand‑jury transcripts in early December 2025, citing the recent statute as superseding the typical prohibition on disclosure [2] [3].
4. The Maxwell grand‑jury orders: an initial rejection, then a December reversal in New York
In the related Ghislaine Maxwell matter, New York Judge Paul Engelmayer initially denied the DOJ’s summer 2025 request to disclose grand‑jury materials (concluding grand‑jury secrecy is strong and victims’ interests weighed against disclosure), but in December 2025 he reversed course and ordered those Maxwell grand‑jury materials unsealed, reasoning that the new Act “textually covers” the materials even though the Act did not explicitly name grand‑jury files [6].
5. Reversals and timing: December 2025 as the turning point
Across districts, the key change came in December 2025 after Congress passed and the president signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act; judges in Florida and New York entered orders in early to mid‑December 2025 authorizing unsealing or modification of protective orders — Judge Smith’s Florida order (decisions involving the 2005–07 transcripts) and Judge Berman’s Manhattan reversal (authorizing release of 2019 materials) are dated in that December window, with Berman’s reversal reported on December 10, 2025 [1] [4] [3].
6. What remains sealed and why — the judges’ carve‑outs and redactions
Even after the December unsealing orders, judges and the DOJ preserved significant limits: reporting indicates roughly 70 pages of federal grand‑jury material remained ordered sealed or heavily redacted by earlier rulings and that the DOJ released materials with substantial redactions to protect victims, with some files entirely blacked out in the published trove [5] [7] [8].
7. Bottom line and limits of the public record
The specific judicial entries that maintained seals were the August 2025 Manhattan denial by Judge Berman (denying DOJ’s unsealing request) and longstanding Florida sealing orders covering the 2005–07 grand jury proceedings; those prior seals were effectively superseded or modified by December 2025 court orders tied to the Epstein Files Transparency Act — Judge Rodney Smith in Florida and Judges Paul Engelmayer and Richard Berman in New York issued the unsealing or release orders in early to mid‑December 2025 — but judges retained authority to keep portions sealed or redacted, leaving dozens of pages still withheld [1] [2] [3] [6] [5].