Which specific FBI NTOC tips mentioning Donald Trump were included in the Epstein release, and what did agents note about their credibility?

1. What specific NTOC tips appear in the release

The public tranche includes an internal FBI email/ spreadsheet from August 2020 that compiles multiple calls and electronic tips forwarded to the FBI’s NTOC and a prosecutors’ hotline that reference Trump among many other prominent figures; that summary lists a range of allegations including claims of sexual misconduct and references to alleged sex‑party attendance ^{[1] [5] [6]}. Among the most widely reported entries is a tip received by the FBI in which a woman said a friend, then about 13–14 years old, was forced to perform oral sex on Donald Trump in New Jersey roughly 35 years earlier and allegedly bit him, prompting him to hit her — an allegation that appears in several summaries of the released material ^{[2] [3] [7] [8]}. Another sensational entry that briefly circulated in a DOJ‑published then‑removed document claimed “calendar girl” parties at Mar‑a‑Lago where Epstein would bring children and Trump would “auction” them off — a graphic and unverified assertion found in a highlighted NTOC table entry ^[9].

2. How the FBI and DOJ described those tips inside their files

DOJ and FBI notes attached to the production repeatedly flag that many items came from public submissions to the NTOC and therefore include material that is “fake or falsely submitted,” and the department warned that some entries were “untrue and sensationalist” and many were submitted right before the 2020 election ^{[10] [11]}. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told CNN that the FBI received hundreds of calls and that many of the tips were anonymous or second‑hand, which investigators quickly determined were not credible or lacked contactable sources or corroboration ^{[4] [12]}.

3. What agents wrote about credibility and follow‑up

Internal emails and the NTOC table itself include columns and highlighting showing how tips were tracked and whether any follow‑up occurred; reporting indicates some entries show limited or no corroboration and that certain tips were forwarded to field offices for possible follow‑up yet were not found to contain reliable evidence that would support prosecution ^{[9] [1] [8]}. News accounts and DOJ statements emphasize that the material in the public production includes unvetted submissions the FBI received from the public, and officials said if any tip had credible corroboration it would have been pursued more aggressively and likely publicized earlier ^{[10] [12]}.

4. Limits of the released material and what cannot be concluded

The released NTOC summaries omit many identifying details and often do not include the original intake call recordings or full investigative files, so independent reporters and readers cannot determine when tips were made, who made them, whether names were consistent, or what investigative steps — if any beyond an initial referral — were actually executed ^{[5] [9]}. Major outlets that examined the files stated they were unable to corroborate the allegations found in the tips and noted the FBI had described some Epstein‑related tips about Trump as “not credible” in internal records ^{[8] [2]}.

5. Competing narratives and institutional incentives to flag material

The DOJ framed the mass production as a transparency effort while simultaneously warning the public that the dump contains raw, unvetted public submissions that may be false or politically motivated, an implicit reminder that information submitted shortly before elections can be weaponized — a tension reporters flagged as they balanced survivor privacy, public interest, and the risk of amplifying unproven accusations ^{[10] [11]}. Critics of the release fault the department for dumping raw tips that name survivors or defendants without context; defenders say withholding even demonstrably false tips could be portrayed as hiding evidence, creating an institutional incentive to publish everything but clearly label credibility assessments ^{[5] [12]}.

6. Bottom line for readers following claims about Trump in the Epstein files

The publicly released NTOC material contains multiple tip summaries naming Trump, the most detailed of which allege sexual abuse of minors and a sensational “calendar girl” auction claim, but DOJ and FBI notes attached to the release explicitly characterize many such tips as anonymous, second‑hand, uncorroborated or “not credible,” and the reporting to date finds no confirmed, prosecutable evidence emerging from those NTOC submissions in the released records ^{[3] [9] [4] [10]}.