Which nationalities and demographics saw the largest changes in deportations in 2024–2025?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Deportations rose sharply in 2024–2025, with fiscal‑year 2024 removals reaching 271,484 according to aggregated reporting cited in secondary analyses [1], and government dashboards for ICE removals updated through Dec. 31, 2024 provide new nationality and demographic breakdowns [2]. Multiple independent analyses and reporting show Mexico remains the largest single nationality affected and that recent policy shifts have increased removals of non‑criminal migrants and shifted the mix toward more Mexicans and other Latin American nationalities [3] [4] [5].
1. Surge in deportations — the big picture
Federal and independent tallies indicate a major uptick: FY2024 removals reached a post‑pandemic high (271,484 reported in summary reporting) and U.S. agencies published new dashboards through Dec. 31, 2024 that document trends in arrests, detentions and removals [1] [2]. Analysts and advocacy groups attribute the rise to broader enforcement priorities and expanded detention capacity, producing sharply higher removal counts into 2025 [6] [7].
2. Which nationalities moved to the top of the list
Mexico leads deportation counts in 2025 to date, followed by Guatemala, Honduras, Ecuador and Colombia in several compilations of ICE and media data [3] [5]. Country‑level reporting also highlights notable increases in deportations to Ecuador in 2024 (13,589 reported by Ecuador’s foreign ministry) and continuing flights into 2025 [4]. Multiple sources point to South and Central American nationalities accounting for the largest absolute changes [3] [4].
3. Demographic shift: non‑criminal migrants increasingly affected
Reports indicate a marked change in the profile of people subject to enforcement: internal ICE documents and independent analysts say a rising share of those detained and removed have no violent criminal convictions, with some datasets showing less than 10% had criminal offenses and other nonpublic data citing 65% had no criminal convictions [4]. This represents a shift from prior enforcement that emphasized criminal convictions and has drawn scrutiny from civil‑liberties groups [4] [8].
4. Families and asylum seekers: drop in encounters but exposure to removal
Border encounter patterns changed in 2024 and 2025, with encounters peaking in 2023 and dropping sharply in 2024; enforcement measures appear to have particularly reduced family and non‑Mexican migration flows while increasing the Mexican share of encounters [9] [6]. Migration Policy Institute and reporting indicate policies in 2025 were especially effective at lowering family encounters and raising the relative share of Mexican crossings [6].
5. Policy drivers and stated targets
The administration set ambitious removal goals — public references to targeting up to 1 million removals annually appear in policy debates and budget requests — and DHS budget and public messaging supported large‑scale enforcement, including incentives and campaigns encouraging voluntary departures [10] [11] [12]. Independent outlets and government spokespeople also reported hundreds of thousands of removals during 2025, signaling a policy‑driven expansion of operations [12] [13].
6. Conflicting counts and data limitations
Public source counts vary substantially. ICE’s new dashboards cover through Dec. 31, 2024 but DHS and independent trackers present different fiscal and calendar counts for 2025; media and think‑tank estimates (MPI, Reuters, Prison Policy) diverge on totals and on the share of voluntary departures versus formal removals [2] [6] [13] [7]. These differences stem from varying inclusion rules (voluntary departures, charter flights, detainee releases) and incomplete public releases by agencies [6] [7].
7. Economic and social implications highlighted by analysts
Economists and policy institutes warn that mass removals would disproportionately affect sectors with large immigrant workforces — construction and child care singled out — and would impose large fiscal costs if sustained at projected scales [10]. These projections underpin arguments both for and against aggressive enforcement; advocates of tougher enforcement stress sovereignty and rule‑of‑law, while critics point to labor and community disruption [10].
8. What the sources do — and do not — say
Available sources confirm which nationalities dominate removal figures (Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Ecuador, Colombia) and document a demographic shift toward more non‑criminal deportees and larger family‑and‑noncitizen impacts [3] [4] [5]. Available sources do not mention a comprehensive, reconciled national breakdown that covers every month of 2024–2025 with uniform methodology; agencies and independent analysts still publish inconsistent tallies and definitional choices that limit precise cross‑source comparisons [2] [7].
Bottom line: nation‑level counts show the largest absolute increases among Mexican and other Latin American nationals, while demographics shifted toward greater removal of migrants without violent convictions and fewer family encounters — but public data remain fragmented, and different trackers report divergent totals and inclusion rules [3] [4] [7].