Which affidavits or witness statements in Trump-related cases mention a 13-year-old?

1. What the filings say — an unnamed 13‑year‑old plaintiff and two declarations

The core public record is a federal complaint brought by an anonymous plaintiff who says she was 13 in 1994 and that sexual assaults occurred at parties tied to Jeffrey Epstein; that complaint was filed with at least two supporting declarations, including one signed by the plaintiff herself asserting “I was 13 years old,” and a separate witness declaration from someone using the name “Tiffany Doe” who says she witnessed encounters ^{[2] [1] [4]}.

2. Media summaries and how outlets describe the documents

Major outlets and summaries—PBS, Courthouse News Service and others—report that Jane Doe (sometimes identified in filings under other pseudonyms) alleges repeated rape by Epstein and Trump when she was 13, and that a witness declaration from “Tiffany Doe” claims to have recruited the minor to parties and to have witnessed several sexual encounters ^{[3] [4]}. Fact‑checking sites likewise corroborated that the online copies tracked to the federal lawsuit contain those age allegations ^[5].

3. What is corroborated in the public record versus what sources do not address

The available filings and reporting clearly show an allegation that the plaintiff was 13 and that two declarations accompanied the complaint: the plaintiff’s own declaration and a witness declaration ^{[2] [1] [4]}. Available sources do not mention independent law‑enforcement findings, criminal charges arising directly from this specific 1994 allegation, or court rulings adjudicating the underlying facts of that complaint in the public material provided here ^{[4] [1]} — those matters are not found in the current reporting cited.

4. Names, pseudonyms and anonymity: how reporting handles identities

The plaintiff in the filings is anonymous in public records and reporting—referred to as “Jane Doe” and sometimes noted to have used a pseudonym like “Katie Johnson” in filings—while the alleged witness has been identified in the filings as “Tiffany Doe.” Reporting stresses those are legal pseudonyms used to protect the complainant’s identity in civil filings ^{[3] [4]}.

5. Disputes, fact‑checking and the broader context

Fact‑checkers have cautioned that while the complaint and declarations exist in court records and online, such filings are allegations and do not constitute criminal convictions; PolitiFact and other reviewers confirmed the filings include the 13‑year‑old claim but flagged how social media amplified a claim of “exposure” as if it were a proven criminal finding ^[5]. Reporting from Courthouse News and the filed PDF extracts present the plaintiff’s and witness statements verbatim without adjudicating their truth ^{[4] [1]}.

6. Why this matters to readers and how to weigh the materials

Court declarations and complaints are primary documents that state allegations under penalty of perjury, which makes them newsworthy; they are not, however, final determinations of fact. Readers should note the documents’ anonymity practices, the existence of multiple supporting declarations in the civil complaint, and the distinction drawn by fact‑checking outlets between allegations in civil filings and proven criminal conduct ^{[2] [1] [5]}.

Limitations and next steps: the provided sources are copies and media summaries of the civil complaint and declarations but do not include a subsequent court decision resolving those allegations, nor do they present independent law‑enforcement conclusions tied to this specific 1994 allegation; pursuing court dockets or statements from parties would be the next step for verification beyond what the cited reporting contains ^{[4] [1] [3]}.